IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v91y2006i10p1219-1231.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The use of global uncertainty methods for the evaluation of combustion mechanisms

Author

Listed:
  • Tomlin, Alison. S.

Abstract

Complex chemical mechanisms are increasingly used within models describing a range of important chemical processes. Parameters describing the rates of chemical steps and thermodynamics may be highly uncertain, influencing the uncertainty in final model predictions. Local sensitivity analysis is traditionally employed within commercial modelling packages but may not be appropriate for highly uncertain data within non-linear models. There is a need for global uncertainty techniques such as Morris and Monte Carlo methods that can be applied efficiently for computationally expensive models. This paper presents the development of such techniques, along with application to a kinetic mechanism describing the influence of fuel trace elements such as sulphur-containing compounds, on the formation of nitrogen oxide in combustion devices. The analysis evaluates the parameters from within the current sulphur scheme that drive uncertainties in predicted relative changes in nitrogen oxide concentrations when sulphur compounds are added to the fuel. The overall performance of the mechanism is evaluated in comparison with available experimental profiles and the level of agreement between different methods for importance ranking of the rate parameters is highlighted. The use of fitted model representations is also discussed as an alternative method for determining importance ranking, and highlights non-linear interactions between parameters. Finally, possible improvements to the chemical scheme are tested within a Monte Carlo framework under lean flame conditions, where the current mechanism performs the least well with respect to experimental results.

Suggested Citation

  • Tomlin, Alison. S., 2006. "The use of global uncertainty methods for the evaluation of combustion mechanisms," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 91(10), pages 1219-1231.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:91:y:2006:i:10:p:1219-1231
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2005.11.026
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832005002310
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2005.11.026?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ramkishore Singh & Dharam Buddhi & Samar Thapa & Chander Prakash & Rajesh Singh & Atul Sharma & Shane Sheoran & Kuldeep Kumar Saxena, 2022. "Sensitivity Analysis for Decisive Design Parameters for Energy and Indoor Visual Performances of a Glazed Façade Office Building," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-27, October.
    2. Mechri, Houcem Eddine & Capozzoli, Alfonso & Corrado, Vincenzo, 2010. "USE of the ANOVA approach for sensitive building energy design," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(10), pages 3073-3083, October.
    3. Nagy, Tibor & Turányi, Tamás, 2012. "Determination of the uncertainty domain of the Arrhenius parameters needed for the investigation of combustion kinetic models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 29-34.
    4. Singh, Ramkishore & Lazarus, I.J. & Kishore, V.V.N., 2016. "Uncertainty and sensitivity analyses of energy and visual performances of office building with external venetian blind shading in hot-dry climate," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 155-170.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:91:y:2006:i:10:p:1219-1231. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.