IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v257y2025ipas095183202500047x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A dynamic multi-task selective execution policy considering stochastic dependence between degradation and random shocks by deep reinforcement learning

Author

Listed:
  • Liu, Lujie
  • Yang, Jun
  • Zheng, Huiling
  • Li, Lei
  • Wang, Ning

Abstract

To improve the efficiency of UAVs, it is common for a UAV to perform multiple tasks during each departure. However, existing mission abort policies primarily focus on scenarios where the system executes a single task and are not suitable to more complex multi-task missions. Moreover, in practice, degradation and random shocks often occur simultaneously, while existing studies typically only consider their separate effects on mission abort policies. To solve these problems, a multi-task selective execution policy considering the stochastic dependence between degradation and shocks is proposed to determine the next task for the system or the timing for mission abort. First, considering the health state of the system, location information, and the completion state of tasks, a multi-task selective execution policy is proposed. Next, to maximize the cumulative reward of the system, the corresponding sequential decision problem is formulated as a Markov Decision Process. Then, to address the dimensionality curse of continuous state space, a solution method based on deep reinforcement learning algorithms is tailored, incorporating an action masking technique to avoid repeated selection of already executed tasks. Finally, the effectiveness of the proposed method is verified through a numerical study using a UAV for multiple reconnaissance tasks.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu, Lujie & Yang, Jun & Zheng, Huiling & Li, Lei & Wang, Ning, 2025. "A dynamic multi-task selective execution policy considering stochastic dependence between degradation and random shocks by deep reinforcement learning," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 257(PA).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:257:y:2025:i:pa:s095183202500047x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2025.110844
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095183202500047X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2025.110844?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:257:y:2025:i:pa:s095183202500047x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.