IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v256y2025ics0951832024008676.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A new belief rule base model with uncertainty parameters

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Yunyi
  • Du, Ye
  • He, Wei
  • Zhang, Le
  • Wu, Runfang

Abstract

In the current researches on belief rule base (BRB), input parameters are often represented by quantitative values, which limits the ability of BRB to resolve uncertainties. Obviously, uncertainty parameters are more suitable for modeling BRB, so a new BRB-UP model with uncertainty parameters is developed in this paper. In BRB-UP, attribute weight is described as interval value and activation weight is described as random variable. First, the analysis focuses on the mapping relationship between interval attribute weight and activation weight, and based on monotonicity of multivariate function, extreme value of the activation weight can be derived. Second, in the extreme range, activation weight is described as random variable, a new inference engine based on evidential reasoning algorithm (ERA) is proposed, and basic properties of the engine are proved. Third, considering differences in the number of activated rules, a double inference engine for BRB-UP is proposed. Finally, extensive experiments conducted on a JRC-7 M aerospace relay and the NASA lithium battery public datasets demonstrate that, although BRB-UP has a higher time complexity, it exhibits greater precision and stronger robustness compared to BRB.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Yunyi & Du, Ye & He, Wei & Zhang, Le & Wu, Runfang, 2025. "A new belief rule base model with uncertainty parameters," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:256:y:2025:i:c:s0951832024008676
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2024.110796
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832024008676
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2024.110796?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:256:y:2025:i:c:s0951832024008676. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.