IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v256y2025ics0951832024008512.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Expected losses minimization in missions with multi-phase rescue procedure

Author

Listed:
  • Levitin, Gregory
  • Xing, Liudong
  • Dai, Yuanshun

Abstract

Existing mission aborting models assume that a single-phase rescue procedure (RP) is activated and executed upon the termination of the primary mission to save the asset. In some real-world applications, multiple phases of RP may be engaged. During different RP phases, the system may operate with different performance under different random environments modeled by different shocks arrival processes. This paper pioneers the modeling of such multi-phase RP in the mission aborting systems, where the primary mission and different RP phases may be subject to different aborting policies. A probabilistic approach is put forward for evaluating the mission success probability (MSP) and system survival probability (SSP) of the considered system under any given phase aborting policies, based on which the expected mission losses (EML) is further derived. An optimization problem is then formulated and solved, which finds the optimal aborting policies of all phases, minimizing the EML. An unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) payload delivery mission system is analyzed to demonstrate the multi-phase RP and the proposed methodology. Impacts of different RP phase sequences, mission failure penalty, payload cost and shock rates on the MSP, SSP, and EML and on the optimal solutions are also investigated through the UAV case study.

Suggested Citation

  • Levitin, Gregory & Xing, Liudong & Dai, Yuanshun, 2025. "Expected losses minimization in missions with multi-phase rescue procedure," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:256:y:2025:i:c:s0951832024008512
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2024.110780
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832024008512
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2024.110780?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:256:y:2025:i:c:s0951832024008512. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.