IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v256y2025ics0951832024008202.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Few-shot generative compression approach for system health monitoring

Author

Listed:
  • Costa, Nahuel
  • Sánchez, Luciano

Abstract

Prognostics and Health Management (PHM) is essential for maintaining optimal performance in industrial environments. Data-driven methods, particularly those leveraging machine learning and deep learning, have demonstrated effectiveness in PHM-related tasks such as anomaly detection, fault diagnosis, and remaining useful life estimation (RUL). However, the scarcity of precise and labeled information often limits their applicability. In this paper, we introduce a novel approach tailored for cases where only monitoring data is available but very few instances are labeled. The proposed method relies on training a generative model in an unsupervised manner to construct a compressor, which is later used to compute a compressor-based distance metric derived from Kolmogorov complexity. When combined with minimal labeled data, the distance metric can be utilized to perform system health estimation. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the approach through two fleet diagnostic problems, where it surpasses the performance of both supervised and semi-supervised methods. Additionally, our method exhibits consistency in handling partial monitoring information, showcasing its robustness in real-world applications.

Suggested Citation

  • Costa, Nahuel & Sánchez, Luciano, 2025. "Few-shot generative compression approach for system health monitoring," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:256:y:2025:i:c:s0951832024008202
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2024.110749
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832024008202
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2024.110749?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:256:y:2025:i:c:s0951832024008202. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.