IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v256y2025ics0951832024007865.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development and uncertainty analysis of the dynamic simulation for HFETR with BMUS framework

Author

Listed:
  • Zeng, Wenjie
  • Li, Xiaoyu
  • Guo, Chong
  • Li, Zhifeng

Abstract

In this work, a new approach for uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis of research reactor safety is developed, named the BMUS (the Bootstrap and Morris methods for Uncertainty quantification and Sensitivity analysis) framework. The BMUS framework has significant advantages in dealing with small sample sizes, unknown distribution functions, and different dimensions of the input parameters. To verify that the BMUS framework is operational, the uncertainty analysis of High Flux Engineering Test Reactor (HFETR) is conducted under a reactivity insertion hypothetical accident (50 pcm step reactivity perturbation). A Dynamic Analysis of Research Reactor (DARR) simulation tool is established and its accuracy is verified under three hypothetical accidents. During the transient process, the uncertainty quantification results show that the input parameters cause uncertainties in the output parameters, which may lead to power oscillations and sudden temperature changes in the research reactor. The sensitivity analysis results indicate that the strongest correlation is between the core heat transfer coefficient and the secondary outlet temperature. HFETR is moderate sensitive to most of the input parameters, and the highest sensitivity to the heat exchanger heat transfer coefficient.

Suggested Citation

  • Zeng, Wenjie & Li, Xiaoyu & Guo, Chong & Li, Zhifeng, 2025. "Development and uncertainty analysis of the dynamic simulation for HFETR with BMUS framework," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:256:y:2025:i:c:s0951832024007865
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2024.110715
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832024007865
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2024.110715?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:256:y:2025:i:c:s0951832024007865. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.