IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v250y2024ics0951832024003806.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

AI-augmented failure modes, effects, and criticality analysis (AI-FMECA) for industrial applications

Author

Listed:
  • Grabill, Nicholas
  • Wang, Stephanie
  • Olayinka, Hammed A.
  • De Alwis, Tharindu P.
  • Khalil, Yehia F.
  • Zou, Jian

Abstract

Design failure modes, effects, and criticality analysis (d-FMECA)22The term FMEA and FMECA are used interchangeably throughout this paper. The user has the option in the interface to choose either FMEA or FMECA based on their desired application. is a bottom-up, semi-quantitative risk assessment approach that is used by reliability engineers across all industries (nuclear, chemical, environmental, pharmaceuticals, aerospace, etc.) for identifying the effects of postulated components failure modes such as solenoid-operated valves (SOV), motor-operated valves (MOV), controllers, pumps, sensors of various types, printed circuit boards (PCBs). This research aims to develop a novel AI-augmented tool that guides, in real-time, the risk-analyst to a host of potential failure modes and their effects for each component contained in a bigger system. Through a user-friendly graphical interface and a robust statistical modeling backend, the AI-driven tool streamlines the risk assessment process by prompting the risk analyst to input a system’s name and subsequently generate an extensive array of failure modes and associated effects for each constituent component within the system. This AI-augmented tool allows the user to select either a simplified d-FMEA or a detailed d-FMECA for the system under investigation. This novel AI-driven tool offers significant effort and time savings in conducting d-FMECA, which is known to be a labor-intensive engineering task. In addition, this tool can be used for training risk and reliability professionals.

Suggested Citation

  • Grabill, Nicholas & Wang, Stephanie & Olayinka, Hammed A. & De Alwis, Tharindu P. & Khalil, Yehia F. & Zou, Jian, 2024. "AI-augmented failure modes, effects, and criticality analysis (AI-FMECA) for industrial applications," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:250:y:2024:i:c:s0951832024003806
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2024.110308
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832024003806
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2024.110308?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liu, Di & Wang, Shaoping & Cui, Xiaoyu, 2022. "An artificial neural network supported Wiener process based reliability estimation method considering individual difference and measurement error," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 218(PB).
    2. Zhang, Pei & Zhang, Zhen-Ji & Gong, Da-Qing, 2024. "An improved failure mode and effect analysis method for group decision-making in utility tunnels construction project risk evaluation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    3. Barlow, Richard E. & Proschan, Frank, 1975. "Importance of system components and fault tree events," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 3(2), pages 153-173, April.
    4. Li, Ying & Liu, Peide & Li, Gang, 2023. "An asymmetric cost consensus based failure mode and effect analysis method with personalized risk attitude information," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    5. Nguyen, Van-Thai & Do, Phuc & Vosin, Alexandre & Iung, Benoit, 2022. "Artificial-intelligence-based maintenance decision-making and optimization for multi-state component systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    6. Liu, Peide & Li, Ying, 2021. "An improved failure mode and effect analysis method for multi-criteria group decision-making in green logistics risk assessment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    7. Kapusuzoglu, Berkcan & Mahadevan, Sankaran, 2021. "Information fusion and machine learning for sensitivity analysis using physics knowledge and experimental data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    8. Bae, Jinwoo & Xi, Zhimin, 2022. "Learning of physical health timestep using the LSTM network for remaining useful life estimation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    9. Wu, Hao & Xu, Yanwen & Liu, Zheng & Li, Yumeng & Wang, Pingfeng, 2023. "Adaptive machine learning with physics-based simulations for mean time to failure prediction of engineering systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    10. Dhalmahapatra, Krantiraditya & Garg, Ashish & Singh, Kritika & Xavier, Nirmal Francis & Maiti, J., 2022. "An integrated RFUCOM – RTOPSIS approach for failure modes and effects analysis: A case of manufacturing industry," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    11. Wang, Qun & Jia, Guozhu & Jia, Yuning & Song, Wenyan, 2021. "A new approach for risk assessment of failure modes considering risk interaction and propagation effects," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    12. Ziegler Haselein, Bruno & da Silva, Jonny Carlos & Hooey, Becky L., 2024. "Multiple machine learning modeling on near mid-air collisions: An approach towards probabilistic reasoning," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Pei & Zhang, Zhen-Ji & Gong, Da-Qing, 2024. "An improved failure mode and effect analysis method for group decision-making in utility tunnels construction project risk evaluation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    2. Martínez-Galán Fernández, Pablo & Guillén López, Antonio J. & Márquez, Adolfo Crespo & Gomez Fernández, Juan Fco. & Marcos, Jose Antonio, 2022. "Dynamic Risk Assessment for CBM-based adaptation of maintenance planning," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    3. Wang, Xinjian & Xia, Guoqing & Zhao, Jian & Wang, Jin & Yang, Zaili & Loughney, Sean & Fang, Siming & Zhang, Shukai & Xing, Yongheng & Liu, Zhengjiang, 2023. "A novel method for the risk assessment of human evacuation from cruise ships in maritime transportation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    4. Song, Xueying & Qi, Lei & Liu, Shiyan & Ding, Shuiting & Li, Daqing, 2024. "Simple analysis of complex system safety based on Finite State Machine Network and phase space theory," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    5. Chen, Chuanhai & Li, Bowen & Guo, Jinyan & Liu, Zhifeng & Qi, Baobao & Hua, Chunlei, 2022. "Bearing life prediction method based on the improved FIDES reliability model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    6. Hughes, William & Zhang, Wei & Cerrai, Diego & Bagtzoglou, Amvrossios & Wanik, David & Anagnostou, Emmanouil, 2022. "A Hybrid Physics-Based and Data-Driven Model for Power Distribution System Infrastructure Hardening and Outage Simulation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    7. Marichal, Jean-Luc & Mathonet, Pierre, 2013. "On the extensions of Barlow–Proschan importance index and system signature to dependent lifetimes," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 48-56.
    8. Gao, Xueli & Cui, Lirong & Li, Jinlin, 2007. "Analysis for joint importance of components in a coherent system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 182(1), pages 282-299, October.
    9. Lyu, Dong & Si, Shubin, 2021. "Importance measure for K-out-of-n: G systems under dynamic random load considering strength degradation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    10. Zheng, Xiaohu & Yao, Wen & Zhang, Yunyang & Zhang, Xiaoya, 2022. "Consistency regularization-based deep polynomial chaos neural network method for reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    11. Masry, Elias, 2003. "Local polynomial fitting under association," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 86(2), pages 330-359, August.
    12. Dong Lyu & Shubin Si & Zhiqiang Cai & Liyang Xie, 2020. "Computational method for importance measure of the k-out-of-n system based on stress–strength interference," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 234(1), pages 27-40, February.
    13. Nazarizadeh, Farzaneh & Alemtabriz, Akbar & Zandieh, Mostafa & Raad, Abbas, 2022. "An analytical model for reliability assessment of the rail system considering dependent failures (case study of Iranian railway)," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    14. Jung, WoongHee & Taflanidis, Alexandros A., 2023. "Efficient global sensitivity analysis for high-dimensional outputs combining data-driven probability models and dimensionality reduction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    15. Li, Ruiying & Gao, Ying, 2022. "On the component resilience importance measures for infrastructure systems," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 36(C).
    16. Fang, Hong-Bin & Fang, Kai-Tai & Kotz, Samuel, 2002. "The Meta-elliptical Distributions with Given Marginals," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 82(1), pages 1-16, July.
    17. Krzysztof J. Szajowski, 2020. "Rationalization of detection of the multiple disorders," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 61(4), pages 1545-1563, August.
    18. Si, Shubin & Levitin, Gregory & Dui, Hongyan & Sun, Shudong, 2014. "Importance analysis for reconfigurable systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 72-80.
    19. Stefano Moretti & Fioravante Patrone, 2008. "Transversality of the Shapley value," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 16(1), pages 1-41, July.
    20. Zhu, Xiaoyan & Chen, Zhiqiang & Borgonovo, Emanuele, 2021. "Remaining-useful-lifetime and system-remaining-profit based importance measures for decisions on preventive maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:250:y:2024:i:c:s0951832024003806. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.