IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v240y2023ics0951832023004854.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mapping the fire risk in buildings: A hybrid method of ASET-RSET concept and FED concept

Author

Listed:
  • Junfeng, Chen
  • Maohua, Zhong
  • Peiyun, Qiu
  • Zeng, Long
  • Jiacheng, Chen

Abstract

Fire is a critical threat to large buildings. With the fire smoke diffusion, the risk of injury and death exists over a wide area. To investigate the fire risk level of large buildings, a Risk Index is defined as the fractional effective dose at the moment of required safe egress time to model the maximum potential fire risk of an area. Then, the map-based method is adopted to acquire a Risk Index map for each fire scenario and a Risk Index scenario map for the whole building. Finally, the overall fire risk of a fire scenario and a building could be acquired by integrating the Risk Index in each area and the Risk Index scenario in each fire scenario. The platform of a subway station is taken as a case study to validate the applicability of the proposed method. The results indicate that the method provides a more detailed and accurate evaluation of fire risk distribution of each fire scenario and the whole platform. Besides, the proposed method can provide more flexible and adaptive evacuation strategy recommendations. The results could be used for future fire risk evaluation, worst fire scenario identification and evacuation strategy design in different buildings.

Suggested Citation

  • Junfeng, Chen & Maohua, Zhong & Peiyun, Qiu & Zeng, Long & Jiacheng, Chen, 2023. "Mapping the fire risk in buildings: A hybrid method of ASET-RSET concept and FED concept," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:240:y:2023:i:c:s0951832023004854
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2023.109571
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832023004854
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2023.109571?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:240:y:2023:i:c:s0951832023004854. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.