IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v188y2019icp336-346.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Benchmarking static code analyzers

Author

Listed:
  • Herter, Jörg
  • Kästner, Daniel
  • Mallon, Christoph
  • Wilhelm, Reinhard

Abstract

We show that a widely used benchmark set for the comparison of static†=analysis tools exhibits an impressive number of weaknesses, and that the internationally accepted quantitative†=evaluation metrics may lead to useless results. The weaknesses in the benchmark set were identified by applying a sound static analysis to the programs in this set and carefully interpreting the results. We propose how to deal with weaknesses of the quantitative metrics and how to improve such benchmarks and the evaluation process, in particular for external evaluations, in which an ideally neutral institution does the evaluation, whose results potential clients can trust. We also show that sufficiently high quality of the test cases makes an automatic result evaluation possible.

Suggested Citation

  • Herter, Jörg & Kästner, Daniel & Mallon, Christoph & Wilhelm, Reinhard, 2019. "Benchmarking static code analyzers," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 336-346.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:188:y:2019:i:c:p:336-346
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2019.03.031
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832018304721
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2019.03.031?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:188:y:2019:i:c:p:336-346. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.