IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v155y2016icp224-235.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A surrogate method for density-based global sensitivity analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Rahman, Sharif

Abstract

This paper describes an accurate and computationally efficient surrogate method, known as the polynomial dimensional decomposition (PDD) method, for estimating a general class of density-based f-sensitivity indices. Unlike the variance-based Sobol index, the f-sensitivity index is applicable to random input following dependent as well as independent probability distributions. The proposed method involves PDD approximation of a high-dimensional stochastic response of interest, forming a surrogate input–output data set; kernel density estimations of output probability density functions from the surrogate data set; and subsequent Monte Carlo integration for estimating the f-sensitivity index. Developed for an arbitrary convex function f and an arbitrary probability distribution of input variables, the method is capable of calculating a wide variety of sensitivity or importance measures, including the mutual information, squared-loss mutual information, and L1-distance-based importance measure. Three numerical examples illustrate the accuracy, efficiency, and convergence properties of the proposed method in computing sensitivity indices derived from three prominent divergence or distance measures. A finite-element-based global sensitivity analysis of a leverarm was performed, demonstrating the ability of the method in solving industrial-scale engineering problems.

Suggested Citation

  • Rahman, Sharif, 2016. "A surrogate method for density-based global sensitivity analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 224-235.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:155:y:2016:i:c:p:224-235
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2016.07.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832016302071
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2016.07.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:155:y:2016:i:c:p:224-235. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.