IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v131y2014icp197-202.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A systems perspective on the unstable approach in commercial aviation

Author

Listed:
  • Moriarty, David
  • Jarvis, Steve

Abstract

Unstable approaches remain a significant contributory factor in commercial aviation accidents that occur during the approach and landing phase. A safe approach requires a carefully ordered sequence of changes to the configuration and speed of the aircraft in order to carry out a safe landing and criteria regarding configuration and speed must be met for an approach to be classified as stable. When an approach does not meet these criteria, often because of unexpected changes, the approach is classified as unstable and the risk of a landing accident or incident is greatly increased. Traditional accident models follow a linear path from cause to effect or describe a linear path through absent or weakened defences. A systems perspective attempts to understand failures by understanding successes under dynamic conditions. Pilots were interviewed about how they choose a particular configuration style during approaches and their reactions to influences that caused them to adapt their profile. Grounded theory method was used to uncover how pilots successfully manage to adapt their working practices in dynamic environments and why these adaptations sometimes fail. The grounded theory based on the data was that pilots must reconcile multiple goals, including those of outside agencies, and it is the success or failure of this reconciliation that determines the success or failure of the approach. The theory of multiple goal reconciliation formed the basis of recommendations to improve the safety of approach procedures, the key one being that a published speed profile would unify the goals of pilots and air traffic controllers, the sole aim then being to get the aircraft to particular positions at particular speeds.

Suggested Citation

  • Moriarty, David & Jarvis, Steve, 2014. "A systems perspective on the unstable approach in commercial aviation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 197-202.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:131:y:2014:i:c:p:197-202
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2014.06.019
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832014001495
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2014.06.019?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lai, Hsueh-Yi & Chen, Chun-Hsien & Zheng, Pai & Khoo, Li Pheng, 2020. "Investigating the evolving context of an unstable approach in aviation from mental model disconnects with an agent-based model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    2. Lai, Hsueh-Yi & Chen, Chun-Hsien & Khoo, Li-Pheng & Zheng, Pai, 2019. "Unstable approach in aviation: Mental model disconnects between pilots and air traffic controllers and interaction conflicts," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 383-391.
    3. Lai, Hsueh-Yi, 2023. "Breakdowns in team resilience during aircraft landing due to mental model disconnects as identified through machine learning," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    4. Lai, Hsueh-Yi & Chen, Chun-Hsien & Zheng, Pai & Khoo, Li Pheng, 2019. "Towards better information transparency in the air traffic landing system: A novel agent-based model with implicit interactions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:131:y:2014:i:c:p:197-202. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.