IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/recore/v61y2012icp91-102.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An environmental and economic analysis for geotube coastal structures retaining dredge material

Author

Listed:
  • Sheehan, C.
  • Harrington, J.

Abstract

This paper investigates the environmental and economic sensitivity of coastal structures for two different construction methods; a traditional rubble mound structure and a geotube coastal structure using dredged material. The analysis is undertaken for two projects: a small scale coastal protection project using a revetment and a medium size capital harbour expansion using a breakwater. This work provides further insight into previously published work by Sheehan et al. (2009) on the economic aspects of geotube technology and identifies the optimum method of construction for each type of coastal structure. An economic sensitivity analysis is undertaken on the key logistical parameters involved in the construction of these coastal structures. An environmental sensitivity analysis focuses on the CO2 emissions produced from the construction of the coastal structures for both construction methods. These sensitivity analyses are undertaken using a decision support software program (DMMAP), developed to assist users at the planning stages of a project to achieve sustainable dredge material management. The key logistical parameters are analysed to generate environmental and economic ranking tables. The analyses highlight that the size of the structure and the distance to the source of the quarry material are crucial factors in determining the optimum construction method. This work shows that geotubes are a viable alternative to traditional rubble mound coastal structures. It also shows that traditional construction methods may be more economical than geotube structures when considering small coastal structures. In general, the larger the scale of the project the greater the potential savings in CO2 emissions and cost that can be achieved through the use of geotube technology. Geotubes, with the use of dredge material, may provide a sustainable beneficial use for dredge material and offer a serious economic and environmental alternative to traditional rubble mound structures.

Suggested Citation

  • Sheehan, C. & Harrington, J., 2012. "An environmental and economic analysis for geotube coastal structures retaining dredge material," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 91-102.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:61:y:2012:i:c:p:91-102
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2012.01.011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344912000134
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resconrec.2012.01.011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:61:y:2012:i:c:p:91-102. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kai Meng (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/resources-conservation-and-recycling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.