IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/recore/v54y2010i3p205-209.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Harmonizing procedures for the evaluation of compost maturity in two compost types in Ghana

Author

Listed:
  • Ofosu-Budu, G.K.
  • Hogarh, J.N.
  • Fobil, J.N.
  • Quaye, A.
  • Danso, S.K.A.
  • Carboo, D.

Abstract

Composting is one of the most favoured options for municipal solid waste recycling for waste streams with high content of biodegradable materials. Compost has many uses including its use in agriculture for soil structure and fertility improvement. However, non-mature composts when applied to soils could present inimical phytotoxic problems to crops. Despite this reality, many developing countries including Ghana, lack simple and reliable compost maturity tests, and run the risk of producing and/or using composts that have not reached maturation stage. This study was conducted to validate some chemical and biological procedures for testing the maturity of composts prepared from agricultural residues (AR) and municipal solid wastes (MSW) in Ghana. Three maturity indices – humus colour, CO2 respirometry, and germination index – were considered for this validation study. For composts produced from crop residues, the optimal values for humus colour test, CO2 evolution test, and germination index were 0.36–0.59, 1.24–1.80gCO2kg−1day−1, 159.5–259.4, respectively. Similarly for the MSW composts the optimal maturity index ranges were 0.41–0.51 for humus colour test, 0.43–0.56gCO2kg−1day−1 for CO2 evolution test and 0–59.1 for germination index. The MSW composts appeared mature under humus colour and CO2 evolution tests, but inhibited germination. Agricultural residue composts on the other hand were found to be mature when subjected to all three maturity tests. This is indicative that composts may pass certain maturity parameters, yet fail germination test. It is therefore concluded that the germination test index is able to discriminate better between mature and non-mature composts.

Suggested Citation

  • Ofosu-Budu, G.K. & Hogarh, J.N. & Fobil, J.N. & Quaye, A. & Danso, S.K.A. & Carboo, D., 2010. "Harmonizing procedures for the evaluation of compost maturity in two compost types in Ghana," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 54(3), pages 205-209.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:54:y:2010:i:3:p:205-209
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.08.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344909001724
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.08.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:54:y:2010:i:3:p:205-209. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kai Meng (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/resources-conservation-and-recycling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.