IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/recore/v50y2007i3p282-292.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public perspective towards wastewater reuse in a medium size, seaside, Mediterranean city: A pilot survey

Author

Listed:
  • Kantanoleon, Nektarios
  • Zampetakis, Leonidas
  • Manios, Thrassyvoulos

Abstract

A questionnaire composing of 36 pre-answered questions was distributed, through high school children (aged 12–15), to their parents in Chalkida, a medium size (55,000 populations), seaside, Mediterranean (Greek), city in effort to evaluate the public's perspective towards wastewater reuse (WWR). This was a pilot survey for the acquisition of experience and insightful hypotheses (which must be tested in the near future) as well as to determine problems and limitations of the applied methodology. From the 380 distributed questionnaires 156 were collected back from which five were discarded. The majority of those answered were women (51.7%) and between 31 and 45 years old (70%). About 41% had a university degree with only 17% of them have graduate elementary school or been literate. Regarding their knowledge for the nature of wastewater, it was clear that were not adequately informed, even though 72% regards their water and wastewater bill to be very high. In general are positive towards wastewater reuse (60%) with industrial application getting a positive vote from the 76% of the population. However, when food related applications like animal crops and greenhouse vegetables cultivations were mentioned, their perspective changed completely with a negative vote of 80% and 77%, respectively. It was clear that urban citizens, such those questioned, behave more as frightened consumers. Their greatest fears are related to inappropriate food production and dangerous consumption, and as a result when reuse suggested applications became increasingly related to food they were presenting an increasingly negative approach. This, in correlation to their fear of a chemical toxic substance in the wastewater (primary reason of WWR hesitation according to their responses), which can not be removed with existing technology (71% believe that) and by authorities (private or public) that can not be trusted (more than 60% of those answered feel this way) explain their hesitations. This pilot study revealed that the public presents a strong hesitation towards any wastewater reuse application schemes related to food production, partially due to lack of adequate information as well as trust towards ruling and monitoring bodies.

Suggested Citation

  • Kantanoleon, Nektarios & Zampetakis, Leonidas & Manios, Thrassyvoulos, 2007. "Public perspective towards wastewater reuse in a medium size, seaside, Mediterranean city: A pilot survey," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 50(3), pages 282-292.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:50:y:2007:i:3:p:282-292
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2006.06.006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344906001479
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resconrec.2006.06.006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Abubakar, Ismaila Rimi & Mu'azu, Nuhu Dalhat, 2022. "Household attitudes toward wastewater recycling in Saudi Arabia," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    2. Proença, Lúcio Costa & Ghisi, Enedir, 2010. "Water end-uses in Brazilian office buildings," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 54(8), pages 489-500.
    3. Buyukkamaci, Nurdan & Alkan, H. Sena, 2013. "Public acceptance potential for reuse applications in Turkey," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 32-35.
    4. Nijhawan, Anisha & Labhasetwar, Pawan & Jain, Priyanka & Rahate, Manish, 2013. "Public consultation on artificial aquifer recharge using treated municipal wastewater," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 20-24.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:50:y:2007:i:3:p:282-292. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kai Meng (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/resources-conservation-and-recycling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.