IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/recore/v115y2016icp31-41.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A preliminary environmental assessment of foil and metallized film centered laminates

Author

Listed:
  • Bayus, Jacob
  • Ge, Changfeng
  • Thorn, Brian

Abstract

This study investigated the potential environmental impacts of three industrial used barrier films, namely, aluminum foil, metallized oriented polypropylene (MOPP) and metallized polyethylene terephthalate (MPET). These three materials are the most commonly used barrier materials in flexible packaging applications. But little to no data is available to compare the environment impact between these three high-volume and fast-moving materials. With the use of SimaPro 8, the environmental impacts of three laminates, centered with aluminum foil, MOPP and MPET, were assessed over the raw material, processing, and end of life phases. The use phase was assessed in part to facilitate recommendation and interpretations. Compared to the aluminum foil centered laminate, the metallized polymer centered laminates reduced impact to metal depletion by 71% for the MOPP laminate and 52% for the MPET laminate. Fossil depletion was reduced by 21% for both metallized polymer laminates and global warming potential is half that of the aluminum foil laminate. Non-renewable embodied energy was reduced by 25–26% compared to foil. The findings will help food and flexible packaging companies visualize environment impacts of the three barrier alternatives in addition to performance and cost.

Suggested Citation

  • Bayus, Jacob & Ge, Changfeng & Thorn, Brian, 2016. "A preliminary environmental assessment of foil and metallized film centered laminates," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 31-41.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:115:y:2016:i:c:p:31-41
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.08.024
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344916302166
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.08.024?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Barlow, C.Y. & Morgan, D.C., 2013. "Polymer film packaging for food: An environmental assessment," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 74-80.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Amna Farrukh & Sanjay Mathrani & Aymen Sajjad, 2022. "A Systematic Literature Review on Environmental Sustainability Issues of Flexible Packaging: Potential Pathways for Academic Research and Managerial Practice," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-21, April.
    2. Amna Farrukh & Aymen Sajjad, 2024. "Investigating sustainability tensions and resolution strategies in the plastic food packaging industry—A paradox theory approach," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 2868-2889, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Karima AFIF & Bocar Samba BA & Eugénie JOLTREAU, 2024. "Tax-subsidy schemes for recycling when quantity and quality of waste matter," Working Papers 2024.02, FAERE - French Association of Environmental and Resource Economists.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:115:y:2016:i:c:p:31-41. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kai Meng (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/resources-conservation-and-recycling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.