IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/quaeco/v99y2025ics106297692400156x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Who’s more efficient and drives others? Profit sharing rates vs. deposit rates

Author

Listed:
  • Gök, Remzi
  • Hammoudeh, Shawkat
  • Ajmi, Ahdi Noomen

Abstract

We investigate the existence of the explosive behavior, long memory and causal impacts for the Islamic and conventional banking sectors in Türkiye during the 2012–2023 period. The procedure detects multiple bubble episodes in all maturities of profit-sharing rates and shorter maturities of deposit rates, mostly intensified after 2017, Islamic banking has longer-lived bubble episodes than conventional banking, and the duration decreases as the maturity increases. We find that the Hurst exponent is significantly greater than 0.50 for Islamic banking, while its magnitude decreases and goes below 0.50 for the maturity longer than 3 months in the conventional banking as the maturity increases in the full sample period. Conventional banking rates are more efficient, and the level of efficiency rises as maturity increases. We find bidirectional causalities between the 1-month maturities and report one-way short-run causal flows from the conventional banking rates for other three maturities. Multifaceted implications for investors and policymakers are discussed in detail.

Suggested Citation

  • Gök, Remzi & Hammoudeh, Shawkat & Ajmi, Ahdi Noomen, 2025. "Who’s more efficient and drives others? Profit sharing rates vs. deposit rates," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:quaeco:v:99:y:2025:i:c:s106297692400156x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.qref.2024.101950
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S106297692400156X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.qref.2024.101950?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:quaeco:v:99:y:2025:i:c:s106297692400156x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620167 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.