IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/pubeco/v13y1980i3p341-368.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A model of benefit and tax share discrimination by a monopoly bureau

Author

Listed:
  • Denzau, Arthur T.
  • Mackay, Robert J.

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Denzau, Arthur T. & Mackay, Robert J., 1980. "A model of benefit and tax share discrimination by a monopoly bureau," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 13(3), pages 341-368, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:pubeco:v:13:y:1980:i:3:p:341-368
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0047-2727(86)90010-1
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zach Raff, 2023. "Identifying the regulator’s objective: Does political support matter?," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 194(3), pages 277-295, March.
    2. Robert Mackay, 1981. "Strategic arms limitation treaties and innovations in weapons technology," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 61-68, January.
    3. Peter Hartley & Chris Trengove, 1986. "Who Benefits from Public Utilities?," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 62(2), pages 163-179, June.
    4. Donald Haurin & H. Gill, 1984. "The spatial distribution of public services: A structural model of voting, educational production, and the government's allocation of educational inputs," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 44(3), pages 481-500, January.
    5. Allan Feldman, 1985. "A model of majority voting and growth in government expenditure," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 3-17, January.
    6. Michael Munger, 1984. "On the mutuality of interest between bureaus and high demand review committees: The case of joint production," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 43(2), pages 211-215, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:pubeco:v:13:y:1980:i:3:p:341-368. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/505578 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.