IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v53y1997i1p13-19.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the cost of using capacity flexibility -- a dynamic programming approach

Author

Listed:
  • Wijngaard, J.
  • Miltenburg, G. J.

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Wijngaard, J. & Miltenburg, G. J., 1997. "On the cost of using capacity flexibility -- a dynamic programming approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 13-19, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:53:y:1997:i:1:p:13-19
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925-5273(97)00103-5
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bakke, Nils Arne & Hellberg, Roland, 1991. "Relevance lost? A critical discussion of different cost accounting principles in connection with decision making for both short and long term production scheduling," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 24(1-2), pages 1-9, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Altendorfer, Klaus, 2017. "Relation between lead time dependent demand and capacity flexibility in a two-stage supply chain with lost sales," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 13-24.
    2. Seebacher, Gottfried & Winkler, Herwig, 2014. "Evaluating flexibility in discrete manufacturing based on performance and efficiency," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 340-351.
    3. Mayorga, Maria E. & Ahn, Hyun-Soo, 2011. "Joint management of capacity and inventory in make-to-stock production systems with multi-class demand," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 212(2), pages 312-324, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kee, Robert & Schmidt, Charles, 2000. "A comparative analysis of utilizing activity-based costing and the theory of constraints for making product-mix decisions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(1), pages 1-17, January.
    2. Amanda Curry, 2019. "Across the great divide: a literature review of management accounting and operations management at the shop floor," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 69(1), pages 75-119, February.
    3. Lea, Bih-Ru & Fredendall, Lawrence D., 2002. "The impact of management accounting, product structure, product mix algorithm, and planning horizon on manufacturing performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(3), pages 279-299, October.
    4. Kee, Robert, 2008. "The sufficiency of product and variable costs for production-related decisions when economies of scope are present," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(2), pages 682-696, August.
    5. Zheng-Yun Zhuang & Shu-Chin Chang, 2017. "Deciding product mix based on time-driven activity-based costing by mixed integer programming," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 28(4), pages 959-974, April.
    6. Machado, Mariana Paim & Abreu, Jaqueline Lilge & Morandi, Maria Isabel Motta & Piran, Fabio Sartori & Lacerda, Daniel Pacheco, 2023. "Exploratory decision robustness analysis of the theory of constraints focusing process using system dynamics modeling," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    7. Tsai, Wen-Hsien & Lai, Chien-Wen & Tseng, Li-Jung & Chou, Wen-Chin, 2008. "Embedding management discretionary power into an ABC model for a joint products mix decision," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(1), pages 210-220, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:53:y:1997:i:1:p:13-19. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.