IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v30-31y1993ip167-178.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring and improving planning stability of reorder-point lot-sizing policies

Author

Listed:
  • Jensen, Thomas

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Jensen, Thomas, 1993. "Measuring and improving planning stability of reorder-point lot-sizing policies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 167-178, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:30-31:y:1993:i::p:167-178
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0925-5273(93)90089-4
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. de Kok, Ton & Inderfurth, Karl, 1997. "Nervousness in inventory management: Comparison of basic control rules," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 103(1), pages 55-82, November.
    2. van Donselaar, K. & van den Nieuwenhof, J. & Visschers, J., 2000. "The impact of material coordination concepts on planning stability in supply chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(2), pages 169-176, November.
    3. Meixell, Mary J., 2005. "The impact of setup costs, commonality, and capacity on schedule stability: An exploratory study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(1), pages 95-107, January.
    4. Heisig, Gerald, 2001. "Comparison of (s,S) and (s,nQ) inventory control rules with respect to planning stability," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(1), pages 59-82, August.
    5. van Donselaar, K. H. & Gubbels, B. J., 2002. "How to release orders in order to minimise system inventory and system nervousness?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(3), pages 335-343, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:30-31:y:1993:i::p:167-178. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.