IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v28y1992i2p227-234.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-attribute decision model using the analytic hierarchy process for the justification of manufacturing systems

Author

Listed:
  • Datta, Vinay
  • Sambasivarao, K. V.
  • Kodali, Rambabu
  • Deshmukh, S. G.

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Datta, Vinay & Sambasivarao, K. V. & Kodali, Rambabu & Deshmukh, S. G., 1992. "Multi-attribute decision model using the analytic hierarchy process for the justification of manufacturing systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 227-234, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:28:y:1992:i:2:p:227-234
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0925-5273(92)90035-6
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Surajit Nath & Bijan Sarkar, 2018. "Decision system framework for performance evaluation of advanced manufacturing technology under fuzzy environment," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 55(3), pages 703-720, November.
    2. Irani, Zahir & Sharif, Amir & Love, Peter E. D. & Kahraman, Cengiz, 2002. "Applying concepts of fuzzy cognitive mapping to model: The IT/IS investment evaluation process," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(1-2), pages 199-211, January.
    3. Sitienei, Isaac & Gillespie, Jeffrey & Scaglia, Guillermo, 2016. "Goal Structure of U.S. Grass-Fed Beef Producers," 2016 Annual Meeting, February 6-9, 2016, San Antonio, Texas 229565, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    4. Sushil, 2020. "Interpretive multi-criteria ranking of production systems with ordinal weights and transitive dominance relationships," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 290(1), pages 677-695, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:28:y:1992:i:2:p:227-234. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.