IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v282y2025ics0925527325000350.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Beyond efficiency: Revisiting AI platforms, servitization and power relations from a critical perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Canboy, Başak
  • Khlif, Wafa

Abstract

This study examines the evolving power dynamics within servitization ecosystems, and especially the role of AI platform providers in them. Drawing on French and Raven's (1959) bases of power, as well as resource dependence theory, we propose a conceptual model that shows how AI providers centralize control and reshape power relations. As AI integrates into servitization, providers leverage informational and expert power through data management and algorithmic expertise, alongside legitimate and referent power, to influence behaviours, promote risk-taking, foster dependency, and establish themselves as central authorities setting standards and norms. They further exploit coercive and reward power to impose conditions and offer incentives that deepen platform reliance, ultimately dominating the ecosystem and establishing a quasi-monopolistic position. We enrich the servitization literature by challenging the prevailing view that AI adoption benefits downstream manufacturers.

Suggested Citation

  • Canboy, Başak & Khlif, Wafa, 2025. "Beyond efficiency: Revisiting AI platforms, servitization and power relations from a critical perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:282:y:2025:i:c:s0925527325000350
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2025.109550
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527325000350
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijpe.2025.109550?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:282:y:2025:i:c:s0925527325000350. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.