IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v282y2025ics092552732500026x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

AI quality control in competitive recycling facing material contamination

Author

Listed:
  • Niu, Baozhuang
  • Lai, Chengwei
  • Zheng, Zebin
  • Qi, Zhiyuan
  • Dai, Zhipeng

Abstract

In a typical material recycling supply chain, material recovery facilities (MRFs) are generally classified as dirty MRFs(dMRFs) whose material faces contamination and clean MRFs(cMRFs) whose material is of high clarity. As the downstream manufacturer, purchasing from dMRFs or cMRFs faces the trade-off between material purchasing price (dMRF's material is cheaper) and the waste disposal cost (dMRF's contaminated material will be wasted and disposed of). This also motivates dMRFs to adopt an AI quality control system to eliminate contamination. We build a game-theoretic model to analyze the decision-makers’ incentive of AI adoption and interesting findings include: (1) Even AI quality control pushes the purchasing price upward, dMRF's supply quantity can be surprisingly reduced, indicating “inefficient use of AI”; (2) AI quality control cost and the manufacturer's waste disposal cost exhibit a substitutable relationship in promoting the dMRF's AI adoption. These findings provide important insights for managers in formulating purchasing strategies, investment decisions, and AI adoption. They are suggested to pay attention to win-win-win situations regarding the dMRF's profit, the manufacturer's profit, and the system's environmental sustainability with the dMRF's AI quality control. Since all-win situations for the stakeholders will not sustain as the equilibrium, subsidy schemes should be designed to improve the cMRF's profit.

Suggested Citation

  • Niu, Baozhuang & Lai, Chengwei & Zheng, Zebin & Qi, Zhiyuan & Dai, Zhipeng, 2025. "AI quality control in competitive recycling facing material contamination," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:282:y:2025:i:c:s092552732500026x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2025.109541
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092552732500026X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijpe.2025.109541?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:282:y:2025:i:c:s092552732500026x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.