IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v273y2024ics0925527324001488.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of a contract manufacturer's entry on two competing platforms' sourcing strategies

Author

Listed:
  • Wu, Xiangxiang
  • Zha, Yong

Abstract

Many platforms, including the likes of Google, Amazon, and Microsoft, are now no longer merely satisfied with providing services or software but are increasingly eager to shape the future landscape of hardware devices. However, contract manufacturers (CMs) who supply hardware devices to such platforms might also produce competing products. This potential competition could prompt these platforms to consider in-house production for their devices. Motivated by this practice, we investigate the sourcing strategies of two competing platforms in the presence of a CM's entry and further explore the interaction between entry and sourcing strategies in a platform supply chain. The platforms select between insourcing the device through in-house production and outsourcing it to the CM. We find that, without entry, the CM's large cost advantage in producing the device relative to the platform induces the platform to choose the outsourcing strategy. In contrast, under entry, the equilibrium sourcing structures hinge upon the extent of the production cost difference between the platform and the CM in producing the device, as well as the degree of the high-efficiency platform's advantage in research and development efficiency over the low-efficiency platform in designing the platform. Particularly, when the CM enters through the platform with low efficiency, the asymmetric sourcing structure in which only the low-efficiency platform outsources is not an equilibrium, whereas the other sourcing structures may exist in equilibrium. Furthermore, in asymmetric sourcing structures, the large production cost difference prevents the CM from entering the market and, more intriguingly, the CM prefers the platforms to adopt the insourcing strategy to gain favourable market entry if the cost difference in producing the device is small. Several extensions are studied to obtain additional insights and demonstrate the robustness of the main findings from the baseline model.

Suggested Citation

  • Wu, Xiangxiang & Zha, Yong, 2024. "Impact of a contract manufacturer's entry on two competing platforms' sourcing strategies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:273:y:2024:i:c:s0925527324001488
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2024.109291
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527324001488
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijpe.2024.109291?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Murat Kaya & Özalp Özer, 2009. "Quality risk in outsourcing: Noncontractible product quality and private quality cost information," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 56(7), pages 669-685, October.
    2. Albert Ha & Xiaoyang Long & Javad Nasiry, 2016. "Quality in Supply Chain Encroachment," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 18(2), pages 280-298, May.
    3. Bin Hu & Yunke Mai & Saša Pekeč, 2020. "Managing Innovation Spillover in Outsourcing," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(10), pages 2252-2267, October.
    4. Anna Nagurney & Dong Li, 2015. "A supply chain network game theory model with product differentiation, outsourcing of production and distribution, and quality and price competition," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 226(1), pages 479-503, March.
    5. Dominique Olié Lauga & Elie Ofek, 2011. "Product Positioning in a Two-Dimensional Vertical Differentiation Model: The Role of Quality Costs," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(5), pages 903-923, September.
    6. Preyas S. Desai & Woochoel Shin & Richard Staelin, 2014. "The Company That You Keep: When to Buy a Competitor's Keyword," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(4), pages 485-508, July.
    7. Ruixue Guo & Hau L. Lee & Robert Swinney, 2016. "Responsible Sourcing in Supply Chains," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(9), pages 2722-2744, September.
    8. Wu, Xiangxiang & Zha, Yong & Yu, Yugang, 2022. "The developer’s sourcing strategy in the presence of a competing manufacturer and consumers’ two-dimensional differentiated preferences," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    9. Guan, Xu & Huang, Song & Chen, Ying-Ju, 2022. "Acquisition transparency and induced supplier encroachment," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    10. Hongyan Shi & Yunchuan Liu & Nicholas C. Petruzzi, 2013. "Consumer Heterogeneity, Product Quality, and Distribution Channels," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(5), pages 1162-1176, May.
    11. Siddhartha Sharma & Amit Mehra, 2021. "Entry of Platforms into Complementary Hardware Access Product Markets," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(2), pages 325-343, March.
    12. Song Huang & Xu Guan & Ying†Ju Chen, 2018. "Retailer Information Sharing with Supplier Encroachment," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 27(6), pages 1133-1147, June.
    13. Albert Y. Ha & Huajiang Luo & Weixin Shang, 2022. "Supplier Encroachment, Information Sharing, and Channel Structure in Online Retail Platforms," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(3), pages 1235-1251, March.
    14. Xu Guan & Baoshan Liu & Ying‐ju Chen & Hongwei Wang, 2020. "Inducing Supply Chain Transparency through Supplier Encroachment," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(3), pages 725-749, March.
    15. Anil Arya & Brian Mittendorf & David E. M. Sappington, 2007. "The Bright Side of Supplier Encroachment," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(5), pages 651-659, 09-10.
    16. Qi Feng & Lauren Xiaoyuan Lu, 2012. "The Strategic Perils of Low Cost Outsourcing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(6), pages 1196-1210, June.
    17. Terrence August & Hyoduk Shin & Tunay I. Tunca, 2018. "Generating Value Through Open Source: Software Service Market Regulation and Licensing Policy," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(1), pages 186-205, March.
    18. Terrence August & Hyoduk Shin & Tunay I. Tunca, 2013. "Licensing and Competition for Services in Open Source Software," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(4), pages 1068-1086, December.
    19. Cuihong Li, 2013. "Sourcing for Supplier Effort and Competition: Design of the Supply Base and Pricing Mechanism," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(6), pages 1389-1406, June.
    20. Wei-yu Kevin Chiang & Dilip Chhajed & James D. Hess, 2003. "Direct Marketing, Indirect Profits: A Strategic Analysis of Dual-Channel Supply-Chain Design," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(1), pages 1-20, January.
    21. Cui, Qinquan, 2019. "Quality investment, and the contract manufacturer’s encroachment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 279(2), pages 407-418.
    22. Dong, Binwei & Tang, Wansheng & Zhou, Chi & Ren, Yufei, 2021. "Is dual sourcing a better choice? The impact of reliability improvement and contract manufacturer encroachment," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    23. Wu, Xiangxiang & Zha, Yong & Ling, Liuyi & Yu, Yugang, 2022. "Competing OEMs’ responses to a developer's services installation and strategic update of platform quality," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(2), pages 545-559.
    24. Yongmin Chen & Michael H. Riordan, 2007. "Price and Variety in the Spokes Model," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 117(522), pages 897-921, July.
    25. Ron Adner & Jianqing Chen & Feng Zhu, 2020. "Frenemies in Platform Markets: Heterogeneous Profit Foci as Drivers of Compatibility Decisions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(6), pages 2432-2451, June.
    26. Tiaojun Xiao & Yusen Xia & G. Zhang, 2014. "Strategic outsourcing decisions for manufacturers competing on product quality," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(4), pages 313-329.
    27. Yanjun Wang & Yugang Yu, 2020. "Flexible strategies under supply disruption: the interplay between contingent sourcing and responsive pricing," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(16), pages 4829-4850, July.
    28. Wedad J. Elmaghraby, 2000. "Supply Contract Competition and Sourcing Policies," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 2(4), pages 350-371, April.
    29. Chen, Jingxian & Liang, Liang & Yao, Dong-qing, 2019. "Factory encroachment and channel selection in an outsourced supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 73-83.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wu, Xiangxiang & Zha, Yong & Yu, Yugang, 2022. "The developer’s sourcing strategy in the presence of a competing manufacturer and consumers’ two-dimensional differentiated preferences," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    2. Zha, Yong & Wu, Xiangxiang & Liu, Haonan & Yu, Yugang, 2023. "Impact of a Platform Developer's Entry on the Device Manufacturer with Different Power Structures and Revenue Models," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    3. Siyu Shi & Chenyu Wang & T. C. Edwin Cheng & Shuai Liu, 2023. "Manufacturer encroachment with an e‐commerce division," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(6), pages 2002-2019, June.
    4. Matsui, Kenji, 2024. "Should competing suppliers with dual-channel supply chains adopt agency selling in an e-commerce platform?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 312(2), pages 587-604.
    5. Matsui, Kenji, 2020. "Optimal bargaining timing of a wholesale price for a manufacturer with a retailer in a dual-channel supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(1), pages 225-236.
    6. Luo, Huajiang & Niu, Baozhuang, 2022. "Impact of competition type on a competitive manufacturer's preference of decision timing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    7. Mandal, Prasenjit & Jain, Tarun, 2021. "Partial outsourcing from a rival: Quality decision under product differentiation and information asymmetry," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 292(3), pages 886-908.
    8. Zhang, Zhe & Song, Huaming & Gu, Xiaoyu & Shi, Victor & Zhu, Jing, 2021. "How to compete with a supply chain partner: Retailer's store brand vs. manufacturer's encroachment," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    9. Chen, Jingxian & Liang, Liang & Yao, Dong-qing, 2019. "Factory encroachment and channel selection in an outsourced supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 73-83.
    10. Gong, Canran & Ignatius, Joshua & Song, Huaming & Chai, Junwu & Day, Steven James, 2024. "The Impact of Platform’s Information Sharing on Manufacturer Encroachment and Selling Format Decision," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 317(1), pages 141-155.
    11. Jinglve Wang & Hongping Yuan, 2023. "Deciphering the Innovation Subsidy Puzzle: Government Choices amid Supply Chain Encroachment," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-38, November.
    12. Yanting Li & Cuihua Zhang & Chunyu Li & Yong Ma, 2024. "Online channel configuration strategy considering contract manufacturer encroachment and green investment," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 2065-2112, September.
    13. Huang, Song & Zhang, Xianmei & Chen, Shuting, 2021. "Information acquisition with advertising threshold effect under manufacturer encroachment in a supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    14. Amirnequiee, Shobeir & Pun, Hubert & Naoum-Sawaya, Joe, 2024. "Navigating supplier encroachment: Game-theoretic insights for outsourcing strategies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 319(2), pages 557-572.
    15. Yao, Yao & Zhang, Jianxiong & Fan, Xiaoqing, 2022. "Strategic pricing: An anti-encroachment policy of retailer with uncertainty in retail service," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(1), pages 144-157.
    16. Xue, Musen & Zhang, Jianxiong & Zhu, Guowei, 2020. "Quantity decision timing with spillover effect and asymmetric demand information," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    17. Wan, Xing & Chen, Jing & Li, Wei, 2023. "The impact of retail pricing leadership under manufacturer encroachment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(1), pages 217-237.
    18. Yang, Jiaquan & Li, Kevin W. & Huang, Jun, 2023. "Manufacturer encroachment with a new product under network externalities," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    19. Chen, Kebing & Liu, Jiawen & Huang, Ziyue & Wang, Shengbin, 2024. "Information sharing strategy and channel selection with substitutable products," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    20. Zhang, Xuefeng & Li, Guo & Liu, Mengqi & Sethi, Suresh P., 2021. "Online platform service investment: A bane or a boon for supplier encroachment," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:273:y:2024:i:c:s0925527324001488. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.