IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v223y2020ics0925527319303585.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Delivery time dynamics in an assemble-to-order inventory and order based production control system

Author

Listed:
  • Lin, Junyi
  • Naim, Mohamed M.
  • Spiegler, Virginia L.M.

Abstract

System dynamics play a critical role in influencing supply chain performance. However, the dynamic property of the assemble-to-order (ATO) system remain unexplored. Based on control theory, the inventory and order based production control system (IOBPCS) family, can be utilized as a base framework for assessing system dynamics. However, the underlying assumption in traditional IOBPCS-based analytical studies is that the system is linear and the delivery time to end customers is negligible or backlog is used as a surrogate indicator. Our aim is to incorporate customer delivery lead-time variance as the third assessment measure alongside capacity availability and inventory variance as part of the so-called ‘performance triangle’– capacity at the supplier, the customer order decoupling point (CODP) inventory and the delivery lead-time. Using the ‘performance triangle’ and adopting non-linear control engineering techniques, we assess the dynamic behaviour of an ATO system in the electronics sector. We benchmark the ATO system dynamics model against the IOBPCS family. We exploit frequency response analysis to ensure a robust system design by considering three measures of the ‘performance triangle’. The findings suggest delivery LT variance can be minimised by maintaining the ATO system as a true Push-Pull hybrid state with sufficient CODP stock, although increased operational cost driven by bullwhip and CODP variance need to be considered. However, if the hybrid ATO system 'switches' to the pure Push state, the mean and variance of delivery LT can be significantly increased.

Suggested Citation

  • Lin, Junyi & Naim, Mohamed M. & Spiegler, Virginia L.M., 2020. "Delivery time dynamics in an assemble-to-order inventory and order based production control system," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:223:y:2020:i:c:s0925527319303585
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.107531
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527319303585
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.107531?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hosoda, Takamichi & Disney, Stephen M., 2012. "On the replenishment policy when the market demand information is lagged," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(1), pages 458-467.
    2. Yang, Taho & Wen, Yuan-Feng & Wang, Fang-Fang, 2011. "Evaluation of robustness of supply chain information-sharing strategies using a hybrid Taguchi and multiple criteria decision-making method," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(2), pages 458-466, December.
    3. Zhou, Li & Naim, Mohamed M. & Disney, Stephen M., 2017. "The impact of product returns and remanufacturing uncertainties on the dynamic performance of a multi-echelon closed-loop supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PB), pages 487-502.
    4. Junyi Lin & Virginia L.M. Spiegler & M.M. Naim, 2018. "Dynamic analysis and design of a semiconductor supply chain: a control engineering approach," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(13), pages 4585-4611, July.
    5. Sipahi, Rifat & Delice, Ismail Ilker, 2010. "Stability of inventory dynamics in supply chains with three delays," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 123(1), pages 107-117, January.
    6. Dejonckheere, J. & Disney, S. M. & Lambrecht, M. R. & Towill, D. R., 2003. "Measuring and avoiding the bullwhip effect: A control theoretic approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 147(3), pages 567-590, June.
    7. Towill, Denis R. & Zhou, Li & Disney, Stephen M., 2007. "Reducing the bullwhip effect: Looking through the appropriate lens," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(1-2), pages 444-453, July.
    8. Edghill, J. & Towill, D. R., 1990. "Assessing manufacturing system performance: Frequency response revisited," Engineering Costs and Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(1-3), pages 319-326, May.
    9. Lin, J. & Naim, M.M. & Purvis, L. & Gosling, J., 2017. "The extension and exploitation of the inventory and order based production control system archetype from 1982 to 2015," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 135-152.
    10. Spiegler, Virginia L.M. & Naim, Mohamed M. & Towill, Denis R. & Wikner, Joakim, 2016. "A technique to develop simplified and linearised models of complex dynamic supply chain systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 251(3), pages 888-903.
    11. Hau L. Lee & V. Padmanabhan & Seungjin Whang, 1997. "Information Distortion in a Supply Chain: The Bullwhip Effect," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(4), pages 546-558, April.
    12. Xiao, Yongbo & Chen, Jian & Lee, Chung-Yee, 2010. "Optimal decisions for assemble-to-order systems with uncertain assembly capacity," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 123(1), pages 155-165, January.
    13. Wang, Xun & Disney, Stephen M., 2016. "The bullwhip effect: Progress, trends and directions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 250(3), pages 691-701.
    14. David Simchi-Levi & Michael A. Trick, 2011. "Introduction to “Little's Law as Viewed on Its 50th Anniversary”," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(3), pages 535-535, June.
    15. Wikner, Joakim & Naim, Mohamed M. & Spiegler, Virginia L.M. & Lin, Junyi, 2017. "IOBPCS based models and decoupling thinking," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 153-166.
    16. Spiegler, Virginia L.M. & Naim, Mohamed M., 2017. "Investigating sustained oscillations in nonlinear production and inventory control models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(2), pages 572-583.
    17. V.L.M. Spiegler & A.T. Potter & M.M. Naim & D.R. Towill, 2016. "The value of nonlinear control theory in investigating the underlying dynamics and resilience of a grocery supply chain," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(1), pages 265-286, January.
    18. Govindan, Kannan & Popiuc, Maria Nicoleta, 2014. "Reverse supply chain coordination by revenue sharing contract: A case for the personal computers industry," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 233(2), pages 326-336.
    19. Suleyman Karabuk & S. David Wu, 2003. "Coordinating Strategic Capacity Planning in the Semiconductor Industry," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 51(6), pages 839-849, December.
    20. Atan, Zümbül & Ahmadi, Taher & Stegehuis, Clara & Kok, Ton de & Adan, Ivo, 2017. "Assemble-to-order systems: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(3), pages 866-879.
    21. Junyi Lin & Mohamed M. Naim, 2019. "Why do nonlinearities matter? The repercussions of linear assumptions on the dynamic behaviour of assemble-to-order systems," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(20), pages 6424-6451, October.
    22. Ben Naylor, J. & Naim, Mohamed M & Berry, Danny, 1999. "Leagility: Integrating the lean and agile manufacturing paradigms in the total supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(1-2), pages 107-118, May.
    23. Roman Kapuscinski & Rachel Q. Zhang & Paul Carbonneau & Robert Moore & Bill Reeves, 2004. "Inventory Decisions in Dell's Supply Chain," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 34(3), pages 191-205, June.
    24. Wang, Xun & Disney, Stephen M. & Wang, Jing, 2014. "Exploring the oscillatory dynamics of a forbidden returns inventory system," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(PA), pages 3-12.
    25. Abhilasha Prakash Katariya & Sıla Çetinkaya & Eylem Tekin, 2014. "Cyclic Consumption and Replenishment Decisions for Vendor-Managed Inventory of Multisourced Parts in Dell’s Supply Chain," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 44(3), pages 300-316, June.
    26. Sagawa, Juliana Keiko & Mušič, Gašper, 2019. "Towards the use of bond graphs for manufacturing control: Design of controllers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 214(C), pages 53-72.
    27. Wang, Xun & Disney, Stephen M. & Wang, Jing, 2012. "Stability analysis of constrained inventory systems with transportation delay," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 223(1), pages 86-95.
    28. Li, Qinyun & Disney, Stephen M. & Gaalman, Gerard, 2014. "Avoiding the bullwhip effect using Damped Trend forecasting and the Order-Up-To replenishment policy," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 3-16.
    29. Grunwald, Herbert J. & Fortuin, Leonard, 1992. "Many steps towards zero inventory," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(3), pages 359-369, June.
    30. Warburton, R.D.H. & Disney, S.M., 2007. "Order and inventory variance amplification: The equivalence of discrete and continuous time analyses," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(1-2), pages 128-137, October.
    31. Erik Hofmann, 2017. "Big data and supply chain decisions: the impact of volume, variety and velocity properties on the bullwhip effect," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(17), pages 5108-5126, September.
    32. Wang, Kung-Jeng & Wee, Hui-Ming & Gao, Shin-Feng & Chung, Shen-Lian, 2005. "Production and inventory control with chaotic demands," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 97-106, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lin, Junyi & Huang, Hongfu & Li, Shanshan & Naim, Mohamed M., 2023. "On the dynamics of order pipeline inventory in a nonlinear order-up-to system," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    2. Zhou, Yuxuan & Wang, Xun & Naim, Mohamed M. & Gosling, Jonathan, 2022. "A system dynamics archetype to mitigate rework effects in engineer-to-order supply chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    3. Sagawa, Juliana Keiko & Oliveira, Allan Freitas & Mušič, Gašper & Land, Martin J. & Maluf, Arthur Sarro, 2023. "Smart workload input-output control of production systems: A proof of concept," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(1), pages 286-305.
    4. Lin, Junyi & Zhou, Li & Spiegler, Virginia L.M. & Naim, Mohamed M. & Syntetos, Aris, 2022. "Push or Pull? The impact of ordering policy choice on the dynamics of a hybrid closed-loop supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 300(1), pages 282-295.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lin, Junyi & Huang, Hongfu & Li, Shanshan & Naim, Mohamed M., 2023. "On the dynamics of order pipeline inventory in a nonlinear order-up-to system," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    2. Lin, J. & Naim, M.M. & Purvis, L. & Gosling, J., 2017. "The extension and exploitation of the inventory and order based production control system archetype from 1982 to 2015," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 135-152.
    3. Lin, Junyi & Zhou, Li & Spiegler, Virginia L.M. & Naim, Mohamed M. & Syntetos, Aris, 2022. "Push or Pull? The impact of ordering policy choice on the dynamics of a hybrid closed-loop supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 300(1), pages 282-295.
    4. Ponte, Borja & Cannella, Salvatore & Dominguez, Roberto & Naim, Mohamed M. & Syntetos, Aris A., 2021. "Quality grading of returns and the dynamics of remanufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    5. Wang, Xun & Disney, Stephen M., 2016. "The bullwhip effect: Progress, trends and directions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 250(3), pages 691-701.
    6. Lin, Junyi & Naim, Mohamed M. & Tang, Ou, 2024. "In-house or outsourcing? The impact of remanufacturing strategies on the dynamics of component remanufacturing systems under lifecycle demand and returns," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 315(3), pages 965-979.
    7. Ponte, Borja & Dominguez, Roberto & Cannella, Salvatore & Framinan, Jose M., 2022. "The implications of batching in the bullwhip effect and customer service of closed-loop supply chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    8. Spiegler, Virginia L.M. & Naim, Mohamed M., 2017. "Investigating sustained oscillations in nonlinear production and inventory control models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(2), pages 572-583.
    9. A. V. Thomas & Biswajit Mahanty, 2021. "Dynamic assessment of control system designs of information shared supply chain network experiencing supplier disruption," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 425-451, March.
    10. María Arquer & Borja Ponte & Raúl Pino, 2022. "Examining the balance between efficiency and resilience in closed-loop supply chains," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 30(4), pages 1307-1336, December.
    11. Yang, Y. & Lin, J. & Hedenstierna, C.P.T. & Zhou, L., 2023. "The more the better? The impact of the number and location of product recovery options on the system dynamics in a closed-loop supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    12. Ponte, Borja & Puche, Julio & Rosillo, Rafael & de la Fuente, David, 2020. "The effects of quantity discounts on supply chain performance: Looking through the Bullwhip lens," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    13. Ponte, Borja & Framinan, Jose M. & Cannella, Salvatore & Dominguez, Roberto, 2020. "Quantifying the Bullwhip Effect in closed-loop supply chains: The interplay of information transparencies, return rates, and lead times," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    14. Ponte, Borja & Costas, José & Puche, Julio & Pino, Raúl & de la Fuente, David, 2018. "The value of lead time reduction and stabilization: A comparison between traditional and collaborative supply chains," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 165-185.
    15. Gaalman, Gerard & Disney, Stephen M. & Wang, Xun, 2022. "When bullwhip increases in the lead time: An eigenvalue analysis of ARMA demand," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    16. Dejian Yu & Zhaoping Yan, 2021. "Knowledge diffusion of supply chain bullwhip effect: main path analysis and science mapping analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(10), pages 8491-8515, October.
    17. Ponte, Borja & Naim, Mohamed M. & Syntetos, Aris A., 2019. "The value of regulating returns for enhancing the dynamic behaviour of hybrid manufacturing-remanufacturing systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 278(2), pages 629-645.
    18. Cannella, Salvatore & Dominguez, Roberto & Ponte, Borja & Framinan, Jose M., 2018. "Capacity restrictions and supply chain performance: Modelling and analysing load-dependent lead times," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 264-277.
    19. Lina Tang & Taho Yang & Yiliu Tu & Yizhong Ma, 2021. "Supply chain information sharing under consideration of bullwhip effect and system robustness," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 33(2), pages 337-380, June.
    20. Yang, Y. & Lin, J. & Liu, G. & Zhou, L., 2021. "The behavioural causes of bullwhip effect in supply chains: A systematic literature review," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:223:y:2020:i:c:s0925527319303585. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.