IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v121y2009i1p49-56.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of automatic fault tree synthesis system using decision matrix

Author

Listed:
  • Yang, Zong-Xiao
  • Zheng, Yan-Yi
  • Xue, Jin-Xue

Abstract

Fault trees synthesis, the basis for fault tree analysis (FTA), serves as a powerful tool for risk analysis. It has become a trend to accomplish computer-assisted fault tree synthesis in the field of system safety engineering because conventional manual construction of fault trees can be extremely time-consuming and vulnerable to human errors. This paper expounds upon a fault tree synthesis information system (FTSIS) developed by means of decision matrix for the purpose of its application to process plants, where the objective system is decomposed into a series of system components whose cause-effect models are constructed and stored in the relational database and transferred into decision matrix. The fault tree is synthesized automatically after the decision matrix is fully searched in FTSIS, the availability of which has been verified after it was put into effect successfully.

Suggested Citation

  • Yang, Zong-Xiao & Zheng, Yan-Yi & Xue, Jin-Xue, 2009. "Development of automatic fault tree synthesis system using decision matrix," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(1), pages 49-56, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:121:y:2009:i:1:p:49-56
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925-5273(09)00103-0
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kengpol, Athakorn, 2008. "Design of a decision support system to evaluate logistics distribution network in Greater Mekong Subregion Countries," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(2), pages 388-399, October.
    2. Hua Tan, Kim & Peng Lim, Chee & Platts, Ken & Shen Koay, Hooi, 2006. "An intelligent decision support system for manufacturing technology investments," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(1), pages 179-190, November.
    3. Iassinovski, Serguei & Artiba, Abdelhakim & Fagnart, Christophe, 2008. "A generic production rules-based system for on-line simulation, decision making and discrete process control," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(1), pages 62-76, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Golmohammadi, Davood, 2011. "Neural network application for fuzzy multi-criteria decision making problems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(2), pages 490-504, June.
    2. Sato, Yuji & Tan, Kim Hua & Tse, Ying Kei, 2017. "Investment performance analysis of industrial products: Case of an effluent processing facility at a chemical company," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 52-58.
    3. Mohammad Ziaei & Seyed Mojtaba Sajadi & Mohammad Mehdi Tavakoli, 2016. "The performance improvement of water pump manufacturing system via multi-criteria decision-making and simulation (a case study: Iran Godakht Company)," International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 17(1), pages 1-15.
    4. Silva, Andreia & Correia Simões, Ana & Blanc, Renata, 2024. "Supporting decision-making of collaborative robot (cobot) adoption: The development of a framework," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    5. Kengpol, Athakorn & Meethom, Warapoj & Tuominen, Markku, 2012. "The development of a decision support system in multimodal transportation routing within Greater Mekong sub-region countries," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(2), pages 691-701.
    6. Cheng, Yang & Matthiesen, Rikke & Farooq, Sami & Johansen, John & Hu, Haibo & Ma, Lei, 2018. "The evolution of investment patterns on advanced manufacturing technology (AMT) in manufacturing operations: A longitudinal analysis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 239-253.
    7. Zhou, Honggeng & Keong Leong, G. & Jonsson, Patrik & Sum, Chee-Chuong, 2009. "A comparative study of advanced manufacturing technology and manufacturing infrastructure investments in Singapore and Sweden," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(1), pages 42-53, July.
    8. Wong, Bo K. & Lai, Vincent S., 2011. "A survey of the application of fuzzy set theory in production and operations management: 1998-2009," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(1), pages 157-168, January.
    9. Ebubekir Karabacak & Hüseyin Ali Kutlu, 2024. "Evaluating the Efficiencies of Logistics Centers with Fuzzy Logic: The Case of Turkey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-25, January.
    10. Bordoloi, Tausif & Shapira, Philip & Mativenga, Paul, 2022. "Policy interactions with research trajectories: The case of cyber-physical convergence in manufacturing and industrials," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    11. Irani, Zahir & Sharif, Amir M. & Love, Peter E.D., 2009. "Mapping knowledge management and organizational learning in support of organizational memory," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(1), pages 200-215, November.
    12. Ho, William & Ma, Xin, 2018. "The state-of-the-art integrations and applications of the analytic hierarchy process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(2), pages 399-414.
    13. Manzini, Riccardo, 2012. "A top-down approach and a decision support system for the design and management of logistic networks," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(6), pages 1185-1204.
    14. María Isabel Lamas Galdo & Javier Telmo Miranda & José Manuel Rebollido Lorenzo & Claudio Giovanni Caccia, 2021. "Internal Modifications to Optimize Pollution and Emissions of Internal Combustion Engines through Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making and Artificial Neural Networks," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-11, December.
    15. García-Melón, Mónica & Poveda-Bautista, Rocío & Del Valle M., José L., 2015. "Using the strategic relative alignment index for the selection of portfolio projects application to a public Venezuelan Power Corporation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(PA), pages 54-66.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:121:y:2009:i:1:p:49-56. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.