IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v121y2009i1p195-202.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Short-term decision support system for maintenance task prioritization

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Lin
  • Ni, Jun

Abstract

Maintenance operations have a direct influence on production performance in manufacturing systems. Short-term production analysis is imperative to enable manufacturing operations to optimally respond to dynamic changes in the system behavior. However, most of the conventional decision support systems for production and maintenance focus on long-term statistic analysis, which is usually not applicable to a short-term period. Maintenance task prioritization is crucial and important for short-term analysis to reduce unnecessary or improper maintenance activities, especially when availability of maintenance resources is limited. The existing methods for maintenance priority assignment are often through heuristic methods or experience, which could cause unscheduled downtime and production losses. In this paper, a short-term decision support system for maintenance task prioritization based on the system operating conditions is introduced. The impact factor for priority assignment is obtained theoretically. A case study based on the simulation of an automotive assembly line illustrates that the proposed short-term system improves the system performance with a lower cost than the long-term method.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Lin & Ni, Jun, 2009. "Short-term decision support system for maintenance task prioritization," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(1), pages 195-202, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:121:y:2009:i:1:p:195-202
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925-5273(09)00157-1
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Qiping Shen & Kak-Keung Lo & Qian Wang, 1998. "Priority setting in maintenance management: a modified multi-attribute approach using analytic hierarchy process," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(6), pages 693-702.
    2. Waeyenbergh, Geert & Pintelon, Liliane, 2002. "A framework for maintenance concept development," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(3), pages 299-313, June.
    3. Wang, Hongzhou, 2002. "A survey of maintenance policies of deteriorating systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(3), pages 469-489, June.
    4. Wang, Ling & Chu, Jian & Wu, Jun, 2007. "Selection of optimum maintenance strategies based on a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(1), pages 151-163, May.
    5. Li, Jing Rong & Khoo, Li Pheng & Tor, Shu Beng, 2006. "Generation of possible multiple components disassembly sequence for maintenance using a disassembly constraint graph," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(1), pages 51-65, July.
    6. Dekker, Rommert, 1995. "Integrating optimisation, priority setting, planning and combining of maintenance activities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 82(2), pages 225-240, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chunlong Yu & Andrea Matta, 2016. "A statistical framework of data-driven bottleneck identification in manufacturing systems," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(21), pages 6317-6332, November.
    2. Afzali, Peyman & Keynia, Farshid & Rashidinejad, Masoud, 2019. "A new model for reliability-centered maintenance prioritisation of distribution feeders," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 701-709.
    3. A. Mosallam & K. Medjaher & N. Zerhouni, 2016. "Data-driven prognostic method based on Bayesian approaches for direct remaining useful life prediction," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 27(5), pages 1037-1048, October.
    4. Xia, Tangbin & Xi, Lifeng & Zhou, Xiaojun & Lee, Jay, 2012. "Dynamic maintenance decision-making for series–parallel manufacturing system based on MAM–MTW methodology," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 221(1), pages 231-240.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pinciroli, Luca & Baraldi, Piero & Zio, Enrico, 2023. "Maintenance optimization in industry 4.0," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    2. Wang, Ling & Chu, Jian & Wu, Jun, 2007. "Selection of optimum maintenance strategies based on a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(1), pages 151-163, May.
    3. Alsyouf, Imad, 2009. "Maintenance practices in Swedish industries: Survey results," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(1), pages 212-223, September.
    4. Faccio, M. & Persona, A. & Sgarbossa, F. & Zanin, G., 2014. "Industrial maintenance policy development: A quantitative framework," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(PA), pages 85-93.
    5. Priyank Srivastava & Dinesh Khanduja & V. P. Agrawal, 2020. "Agile maintenance attribute coding and evaluation based decision making in sugar manufacturing plant," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 57(2), pages 553-583, June.
    6. Oakley, Jordan L. & Wilson, Kevin J. & Philipson, Pete, 2022. "A condition-based maintenance policy for continuously monitored multi-component systems with economic and stochastic dependence," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    7. Carpitella, Silvia & Mzougui, Ilyas & Benítez, Julio & Carpitella, Fortunato & Certa, Antonella & Izquierdo, Joaquín & La Cascia, Marco, 2021. "A risk evaluation framework for the best maintenance strategy: The case of a marine salt manufacture firm," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    8. Néstor Rodríguez-Padial & Marta Marín & Rosario Domingo, 2017. "An Approach to Integrating Tactical Decision-Making in Industrial Maintenance Balance Scorecards Using Principal Components Analysis and Machine Learning," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-15, October.
    9. Ishizaka, Alessio & Nemery, Philippe, 2014. "Assigning machines to incomparable maintenance strategies with ELECTRE-SORT," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 45-59.
    10. Marais, Karen B., 2013. "Value maximizing maintenance policies under general repair," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 76-87.
    11. Wang, Ling & Chu, Jian & Mao, Weijie, 2009. "A condition-based replacement and spare provisioning policy for deteriorating systems with uncertain deterioration to failure," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 194(1), pages 184-205, April.
    12. Marais, Karen B. & Saleh, Joseph H., 2009. "Beyond its cost, the value of maintenance: An analytical framework for capturing its net present value," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 644-657.
    13. Bana e Costa, Carlos A. & Carnero, María Carmen & Oliveira, Mónica Duarte, 2012. "A multi-criteria model for auditing a Predictive Maintenance Programme," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 217(2), pages 381-393.
    14. B. Kirubakaran & M. Ilangkumaran, 2016. "Selection of optimum maintenance strategy based on FAHP integrated with GRA–TOPSIS," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 245(1), pages 285-313, October.
    15. de Jonge, Bram & Scarf, Philip A., 2020. "A review on maintenance optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(3), pages 805-824.
    16. Özcan, Evren Can & Ünlüsoy, Sultan & Eren, Tamer, 2017. "A combined goal programming – AHP approach supported with TOPSIS for maintenance strategy selection in hydroelectric power plants," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 1410-1423.
    17. Brundage, Michael P. & Chang, Qing & Zou, Jing & Li, Yang & Arinez, Jorge & Xiao, Guoxian, 2015. "Energy economics in the manufacturing industry: A return on investment strategy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P2), pages 1426-1435.
    18. Carnero, MaCarmen, 2006. "An evaluation system of the setting up of predictive maintenance programmes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 91(8), pages 945-963.
    19. Benyou Jia & Slobodan P. Simonovic & Pingan Zhong & Zhongbo Yu, 2016. "A Multi-Objective Best Compromise Decision Model for Real-Time Flood Mitigation Operations of Multi-Reservoir System," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(10), pages 3363-3387, August.
    20. Hashemi, M. & Asadi, M. & Zarezadeh, S., 2020. "Optimal maintenance policies for coherent systems with multi-type components," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:121:y:2009:i:1:p:195-202. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.