IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v113y2008i2p819-833.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cooperative dispatching for minimizing mean flowtime in a dynamic flowshop

Author

Listed:
  • El-Bouri, Ahmed
  • Balakrishnan, Subramaniam
  • Popplewell, Neil

Abstract

A new, cooperative job dispatching approach is presented to minimize the mean flowtime in dynamic flowshops. A dispatching decision taken at any machine is reached collectively through consultation with other machines, and conflicting priorities are resolved by employing a penalty-based procedure. Computer results indicate that the proposed cooperative dispatching gives improvements ranging between 1.5% and 11.4% over other dispatching rules, under different levels of shop congestion, and for flowshops possessing various combinations of intermediate FIFO (first-come first-served) and non-FIFO buffers.

Suggested Citation

  • El-Bouri, Ahmed & Balakrishnan, Subramaniam & Popplewell, Neil, 2008. "Cooperative dispatching for minimizing mean flowtime in a dynamic flowshop," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(2), pages 819-833, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:113:y:2008:i:2:p:819-833
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925-5273(07)00336-2
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Reaidy, Jihad & Massotte, Pierre & Diep, Daniel, 2006. "Comparison of negotiation protocols in dynamic agent-based manufacturing systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(1-2), pages 117-130, February.
    2. Ruiz, Ruben & Maroto, Concepcion, 2005. "A comprehensive review and evaluation of permutation flowshop heuristics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 165(2), pages 479-494, September.
    3. Ramasesh, R, 1990. "Dynamic job shop scheduling: A survey of simulation research," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 43-57.
    4. Rajendran, Chandrasekharan, 1993. "Heuristic algorithm for scheduling in a flowshop to minimize total flowtime," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 65-73, February.
    5. Jyi-Shane Liu & Katia Sycara, 1997. "Coordination of multiple agents for production management," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 75(0), pages 235-289, January.
    6. Hunsucker, J. L. & Shah, J. R., 1994. "Comparative performance analysis of priority rules in a constrained flow shop with multiple processors environment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 72(1), pages 102-114, January.
    7. Lodree, Emmett & Jang, Wooseung & Klein, Cerry M., 2004. "A new rule for minimizing the number of tardy jobs in dynamic flow shops," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 159(1), pages 258-263, November.
    8. S. S. Panwalkar & Wafik Iskander, 1977. "A Survey of Scheduling Rules," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 25(1), pages 45-61, February.
    9. Ruiz, Ruben & Stutzle, Thomas, 2007. "A simple and effective iterated greedy algorithm for the permutation flowshop scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(3), pages 2033-2049, March.
    10. Hunsucker, J. L. & Shah, J. R., 1992. "Performance of priority rules in a due date flow shop," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 73-89, January.
    11. R. A. Dudek & S. S. Panwalkar & M. L. Smith, 1992. "The Lessons of Flowshop Scheduling Research," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 40(1), pages 7-13, February.
    12. Averill M. Law & W. David Kelton, 1984. "Confidence Intervals for Steady-State Simulations: I. A Survey of Fixed Sample Size Procedures," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(6), pages 1221-1239, December.
    13. Nawaz, Muhammad & Enscore Jr, E Emory & Ham, Inyong, 1983. "A heuristic algorithm for the m-machine, n-job flow-shop sequencing problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 11(1), pages 91-95.
    14. Rajendran, Chandrasekharan & Holthaus, Oliver, 1999. "A comparative study of dispatching rules in dynamic flowshops and jobshops," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(1), pages 156-170, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hübl, Alexander & Jodlbauer, Herbert & Altendorfer, Klaus, 2013. "Influence of dispatching rules on average production lead time for multi-stage production systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(2), pages 479-484.
    2. Lin, Bertrand M.T. & Lin, Y.-Y. & Fang, K.-T., 2013. "Two-machine flow shop scheduling of polyurethane foam production," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(1), pages 286-294.
    3. Weibo Liu & Yan Jin & Mark Price, 2017. "New scheduling algorithms and digital tool for dynamic permutation flowshop with newly arrived order," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(11), pages 3234-3248, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rajendran, Chandrasekharan & Holthaus, Oliver, 1999. "A comparative study of dispatching rules in dynamic flowshops and jobshops," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(1), pages 156-170, July.
    2. Rubén Ruiz & Ali Allahverdi, 2007. "Some effective heuristics for no-wait flowshops with setup times to minimize total completion time," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 156(1), pages 143-171, December.
    3. Vallada, Eva & Ruiz, Rubén & Framinan, Jose M., 2015. "New hard benchmark for flowshop scheduling problems minimising makespan," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 240(3), pages 666-677.
    4. Sarper, H. & Henry, M. C., 1996. "Combinatorial evaluation of six dispatching rules in a dynamic two-machine flow shop," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 24(1), pages 73-81, February.
    5. Brammer, Janis & Lutz, Bernhard & Neumann, Dirk, 2022. "Permutation flow shop scheduling with multiple lines and demand plans using reinforcement learning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 299(1), pages 75-86.
    6. Perez-Gonzalez, Paz & Framinan, Jose M., 2024. "A review and classification on distributed permutation flowshop scheduling problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 312(1), pages 1-21.
    7. Pessoa, Luciana S. & Andrade, Carlos E., 2018. "Heuristics for a flowshop scheduling problem with stepwise job objective function," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(3), pages 950-962.
    8. Smutnicki, Czeslaw & Pempera, Jaroslaw & Bocewicz, Grzegorz & Banaszak, Zbigniew, 2022. "Cyclic flow-shop scheduling with no-wait constraints and missing operations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(1), pages 39-49.
    9. Sioud, A. & Gagné, C., 2018. "Enhanced migrating birds optimization algorithm for the permutation flow shop problem with sequence dependent setup times," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(1), pages 66-73.
    10. Rajendran, Chandrasekharan & Ziegler, Hans, 2001. "A performance analysis of dispatching rules and a heuristic in static flowshops with missing operations of jobs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(3), pages 622-634, June.
    11. Ruiz, Ruben & Stutzle, Thomas, 2008. "An Iterated Greedy heuristic for the sequence dependent setup times flowshop problem with makespan and weighted tardiness objectives," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 187(3), pages 1143-1159, June.
    12. Branke, Juergen & Pickardt, Christoph W., 2011. "Evolutionary search for difficult problem instances to support the design of job shop dispatching rules," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 212(1), pages 22-32, July.
    13. M. Henneberg & J.S. Neufeld, 2016. "A constructive algorithm and a simulated annealing approach for solving flowshop problems with missing operations," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(12), pages 3534-3550, June.
    14. Ruiz-Torres, Alex J. & Ho, Johnny C. & Ablanedo-Rosas, José H., 2011. "Makespan and workstation utilization minimization in a flowshop with operations flexibility," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 273-282, June.
    15. Fernandez-Viagas, Victor & Ruiz, Rubén & Framinan, Jose M., 2017. "A new vision of approximate methods for the permutation flowshop to minimise makespan: State-of-the-art and computational evaluation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 257(3), pages 707-721.
    16. Benavides, Alexander J. & Vera, Antony, 2022. "The reversibility property in a job-insertion tiebreaker for the permutational flow shop scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(2), pages 407-421.
    17. Kalczynski, Pawel J. & Kamburowski, Jerzy, 2009. "An empirical analysis of the optimality rate of flow shop heuristics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 198(1), pages 93-101, October.
    18. Maria Raquel C. Costa & Jorge M. S. Valente & Jeffrey E. Schaller, 2020. "Efficient procedures for the weighted squared tardiness permutation flowshop scheduling problem," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 487-522, September.
    19. Pan, Quan-Ke & Ruiz, Rubén, 2014. "An effective iterated greedy algorithm for the mixed no-idle permutation flowshop scheduling problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 41-50.
    20. Pan, Quan-Ke & Ruiz, Rubén, 2012. "An estimation of distribution algorithm for lot-streaming flow shop problems with setup times," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 166-180, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:113:y:2008:i:2:p:819-833. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.