IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/pacfin/v90y2025ics0927538x24004062.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does ESG rating policy reduce corporate risk-taking? Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Wu, Shilei
  • Zhou, Fu-You
  • Si, Deng-Kui
  • Hao, Jiawei

Abstract

This paper investigates the impact of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) ratings on corporate risk-taking using non-financial listed firms from 2010 to 2020 in China. We find a significantly negative correlation between ESG ratings and corporate risk-taking, indicating that higher ESG ratings are associated with reduced corporate risk-taking behavior. The result remains held to address endogeneity concerns and various robustness checks. We identify the channels of reducing information asymmetry, enhancing investment efficiency, and improving trade credit through which ESG rating inhibits corporate risk-taking. Further analysis shows that the negative impact of ESG ratings on corporate risk-taking is more pronounced for firms with lower audit quality, voluntary ESG disclosures, and lower institutional ownership. This paper provides a novel theoretical view of the relationship between ESG ratings and corporate risk-taking.

Suggested Citation

  • Wu, Shilei & Zhou, Fu-You & Si, Deng-Kui & Hao, Jiawei, 2025. "Does ESG rating policy reduce corporate risk-taking? Evidence from China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:pacfin:v:90:y:2025:i:c:s0927538x24004062
    DOI: 10.1016/j.pacfin.2024.102654
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927538X24004062
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.pacfin.2024.102654?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:pacfin:v:90:y:2025:i:c:s0927538x24004062. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/pacfin .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.