IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/pacfin/v83y2024ics0927538x23002925.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on the influence of capital market liberalization on the ESG performance of listed companies—A quasinatural experiment based on the Shanghai-Hong Kong and Shenzhen-Hong Kong Stock Connects

Author

Listed:
  • Huang, Rui
  • Duan, Kunyue

Abstract

The Shanghai-Hong Kong and Shenzhen-Hong Kong Stock Connect trading systems, which reflect important innovative policies of China’s capital market reform, have attracted significant attention from both academia and practice concerning their economic consequences. The influence of the Shanghai-Hong Kong and Shenzhen-Hong Kong Stock Connect systems on listed companies’ ESG performance is empirically examined by constructing a difference-in-differences model and selecting data on A-share listed companies from 2009 to 2021. It is found that the Shanghai-Hong Kong and Shenzhen-Hong Kong Stock Connect systems significantly promote the ESG performance of listed companies, and this conclusion holds after robustness testing. This promoting effect is more pronounced in state-owned companies, and the external legal environment is an important safeguard for the Shanghai-Hong Kong and Shenzhen-Hong Kong Stock Connect systems to drive improvements in listed companies’ ESG performance. An analysis of the continuity of capital market liberalization shows that the Shanghai-Hong Kong and Shenzhen-Hong Kong Stock Connect systems have expanded the breadth and depth of capital market liberalization following the QFII system, making the dividends from improved ESG performance more prominent. An analysis of the economic consequences shows that the liberalization of the capital market ultimately enhances corporate value by improving listed companies’ ESG performance. Based on these findings, policy recommendations are proposed for different stakeholders to promote the practical application of ESG, advocate green investment concepts, and promote high-quality, sustainable development in China’s economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Huang, Rui & Duan, Kunyue, 2024. "Research on the influence of capital market liberalization on the ESG performance of listed companies—A quasinatural experiment based on the Shanghai-Hong Kong and Shenzhen-Hong Kong Stock Connects," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:pacfin:v:83:y:2024:i:c:s0927538x23002925
    DOI: 10.1016/j.pacfin.2023.102221
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927538X23002925
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.pacfin.2023.102221?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ruan, Lei & Li, Jianing & Huang, Siqi, 2024. "News or noise? ESG disclosure and stock price synchronicity," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 95(PB).
    2. Zijian Cheng & He Gao & Zhangxin ( Frank) Liu & Sirimon Treepongkaruna, 2024. "Strategic choices in going public: ESG performance implications in China," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(8), pages 7708-7728, December.
    3. Sun, Zhennan & Du, Qunyang & Du, Anna Min & Li, Zhongyuan & Yang, Tianle, 2024. "The information environment and ecological environment perspectives: Capital market openness and firm ESG rating divergence," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    4. Zhao, Yuanshuang & Dong, Liang & Sun, Yuhang & Ma, Yunning & Zhang, Ning, 2024. "Is air pollution the original sin of firms? The impact of air pollution on firms' ESG scores," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:pacfin:v:83:y:2024:i:c:s0927538x23002925. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/pacfin .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.