Properties of the correlational agreement coefficient: A comment to Unlu and Albert (2004)
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
References listed on IDEAS
- Schrepp, Martin, 1999. "On the empirical construction of implications between bi-valued test items," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 361-375, November.
- Unlu, Ali & Albert, Dietrich, 2004. "The Correlational Agreement Coefficient CA(D)--a mathematical analysis of a descriptive goodness-of-fit measure," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 281-314, November.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- repec:jss:jstsof:16:i10 is not listed on IDEAS
- Schrepp, Martin, 2007. "On the evaluation of fit measures for quasi-orders," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 53(2), pages 196-208, March.
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.- repec:jss:jstsof:16:i10 is not listed on IDEAS
- Schrepp, Martin, 2007. "On the evaluation of fit measures for quasi-orders," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 53(2), pages 196-208, March.
- Ünlü, Ali & Schrepp, Martin, 2015. "Untangling comparison bias in inductive item tree analysis based on representative random quasi-orders," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 31-43.
- Schrepp, Martin, 2006. "ITA 2.0: A Program for Classical and Inductive Item Tree Analysis," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 16(i10).
- Unlu, Ali & Albert, Dietrich, 2004. "The Correlational Agreement Coefficient CA(D)--a mathematical analysis of a descriptive goodness-of-fit measure," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 281-314, November.
- Sargin, Anatol & Ünlü, Ali, 2009. "Inductive item tree analysis: Corrections, improvements, and comparisons," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 58(3), pages 376-392, November.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:matsoc:v:51:y:2006:i:1:p:117-123. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/505565 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.