IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/mateco/v49y2013i5p367-374.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficient sets are small

Author

Listed:
  • Beardon, Alan F.
  • Rowat, Colin

Abstract

We introduce efficient sets, a class of sets in Rp in which, in each set, no element is greater in all dimensions than any other. Neither differentiability nor continuity is required of such sets, which include: level sets of utility functions, quasi-indifference classes associated with a preference relation not given by a utility function, mean–variance frontiers, production possibility frontiers, and Pareto efficient sets. By Lebesgue’s density theorem, efficient sets have p-dimensional measure zero. As Lebesgue measure provides an imprecise description of small sets, we then prove the stronger result that each efficient set in Rp has Hausdorff dimension at most p−1. This may exceed its topological dimension, with the two notions becoming equivalent for smooth sets. We apply these results to stable sets in multi-good pillage games: for n agents and m goods, stable sets have dimension at most m(n−1)−1. This implies, and is much stronger than, the result that stable sets have m(n−1)-dimensional measure zero, as conjectured by Jordan.

Suggested Citation

  • Beardon, Alan F. & Rowat, Colin, 2013. "Efficient sets are small," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(5), pages 367-374.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:mateco:v:49:y:2013:i:5:p:367-374
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jmateco.2013.04.006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304406813000335
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jmateco.2013.04.006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aaron S. Edlin & Chris Shannon, 1998. "Strict Single Crossing and the Strict Spence-Mirrlees Condition: A Comment on Monotone Comparative Statics," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 66(6), pages 1417-1426, November.
    2. Debreu, Gerard, 1976. "Smooth Preferences: A Corrigendum," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 44(4), pages 831-832, July.
    3. repec:dau:papers:123456789/5649 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Jordan, J.S., 2006. "Pillage and property," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 131(1), pages 26-44, November.
    5. Mas-Colell,Andreu, 1990. "The Theory of General Economic Equilibrium," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521388702, October.
    6. Debreu, Gerard, 1972. "Smooth Preferences," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 40(4), pages 603-615, July.
    7. Kehoe, Timothy J. & Levine, David K. & Prescott, Edward C., 2002. "Lotteries, Sunspots, and Incentive Constraints," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 107(1), pages 39-69, November.
    8. Beardon, Alan F, 1995. "Quasi-indifference Classes in Utility Theory," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 6(3), pages 529-534, November.
    9. Jordan, J. S. & Xu, Dingbo, 1999. "On the Communication Complexity of Expected-Profit Maximization," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 86(2), pages 185-202, June.
    10. W. E. Diewert, 1973. "Afriat and Revealed Preference Theory," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 40(3), pages 419-425.
    11. Jouini, Elyes, 1989. "A remark on Clarke's normal cone and the marginal cost pricing rule," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 95-101, February.
    12. Debreu, Gerard, 1970. "Economies with a Finite Set of Equilibria," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 38(3), pages 387-392, May.
    13. Epstein, Marcelo & Śniatycki, Jędrzej, 2008. "The Koch curve as a smooth manifold," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 334-338.
    14. Ghanshyam Mehta, 1991. "The Euclidean Distance Approach to Continuous Utility Functions," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 106(3), pages 975-977.
    15. Manfred Kerber & Colin Rowat, 2011. "A Ramsey bound on stable sets in Jordan pillage games," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 40(3), pages 461-466, August.
    16. Mas-Colell, Andreu & Whinston, Michael D. & Green, Jerry R., 1995. "Microeconomic Theory," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780195102680.
    17. Nisan, Noam & Segal, Ilya, 2006. "The communication requirements of efficient allocations and supporting prices," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 129(1), pages 192-224, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Manfred Kerber & Colin Rowat & Naoki Yoshihara, 2023. "Asymmetric majority pillage games," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 52(4), pages 1009-1035, December.
    2. Rowat, Colin & Kerber, Manfred, 2014. "Sufficient conditions for unique stable sets in three agent pillage games," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 69-80.
    3. Simon MacKenzie & Manfred Kerber & Colin Rowat, 2015. "Pillage games with multiple stable sets," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 44(4), pages 993-1013, November.
    4. Bhaskara Rao Kopparty & Surekha K Rao, 2018. "Efficient Sets Are Very Small," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 38(4), pages 2060-2063.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rui Pascoa, Mario & Ribeiro da Costa Werlang, Sergio, 1999. "Determinacy of equilibria in nonsmooth economies," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 289-302, November.
    2. Zhou, Yuqing, 1997. "The structure of the pseudo-equilibrium manifold in economies with incomplete markets," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 91-111, February.
    3. Hayashi, Takashi, 2008. "A note on small income effects," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 139(1), pages 360-379, March.
    4. João Correia-da-Silva & Carlos Hervés-Beloso, 2014. "Irrelevance of private information in two-period economies with more goods than states of nature," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 55(2), pages 439-455, February.
    5. Pierre-André Chiappori & Ivar Ekeland & Felix Kübler & Heracles M. Polemarchakis, 1999. "The Identification of Preferences from Equilibrium Prices," Working Papers hal-00598229, HAL.
    6. P. Jean-Jacques Herings & Herakles Polemarchakis, 2006. "Pareto Improving Price Regulation when the Asset Market is Incomplete," Studies in Economic Theory, in: Christian Schultz & Karl Vind (ed.), Institutions, Equilibria and Efficiency, chapter 12, pages 225-244, Springer.
    7. Paul Oslington, 2012. "General Equilibrium: Theory and Evidence," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 88(282), pages 446-448, September.
    8. João Correia-da-Silva, 2015. "Two-period economies with price-contingent deliveries," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 59(3), pages 509-525, August.
    9. Geanakoplos, John & Polemarchakis, H.M., 2008. "Pareto improving taxes," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(7-8), pages 682-696, July.
    10. repec:dau:papers:123456789/5374 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Sakai, Toyotaka, 2009. "Walrasian social orderings in exchange economies," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(1-2), pages 16-22, January.
    12. Sergio Turner, 2006. "Theory of Demand in Incomplete Markets," Working Papers 2006-07, Brown University, Department of Economics.
    13. Jorge Marques, 2013. "Mathematical Modeling of Consumer's Preferences Using Partial Differential Equations," GEMF Working Papers 2013-15, GEMF, Faculty of Economics, University of Coimbra.
    14. Hosoya, Yuhki, 2013. "Measuring utility from demand," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 82-96.
    15. Carlin, Bruce Ian & Dorobantu, Florin & Viswanathan, S., 2009. "Public trust, the law, and financial investment," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(3), pages 321-341, June.
    16. Berliant, Marcus & Kung, Fan-chin, 2009. "Bifurcations in regional migration dynamics," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 714-720, November.
    17. W D A Bryant, 2009. "General Equilibrium:Theory and Evidence," World Scientific Books, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., number 6875, September.
    18. Besada, Manuel & Garcia, Javier & Miras, Miguel & Vazquez, Carmen, 2002. "Existence of smooth utilities on Banach lattices," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 39-45, February.
    19. P. Jean-Jacques Herings & Herakles Polemarchakis, 2006. "Pareto Improving Price Regulation when the Asset Market is Incomplete," Studies in Economic Theory, in: Christian Schultz & Karl Vind (ed.), Institutions, Equilibria and Efficiency, chapter 12, pages 225-244, Springer.
    20. Schlee, Edward E., 2013. "Radner’s cost–benefit analysis in the small: An equivalence result," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 120(3), pages 570-572.
    21. Bernard Dumas & Andrew Lyasoff, 2012. "Incomplete-Market Equilibria Solved Recursively on an Event Tree," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 67(5), pages 1897-1941, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:mateco:v:49:y:2013:i:5:p:367-374. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jmateco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.