IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/matcom/v78y2008i2p357-366.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparing different approaches for solving optimizing models with significant nonlinearities

Author

Listed:
  • Stemp, Peter J.
  • Herbert, Ric D.

Abstract

The property of saddle-path instability often arises in economic models derived from optimizing behavior by individual agents. In the case when underlying functional forms are nonlinear, it is likely that the stable and unstable arms defining the saddle-path dynamics will also have nonlinear properties. While closed-form analytic solutions can always be derived for linearized deterministic versions of these models, it will be necessary to use numerical techniques to derive the dynamic properties of calibrated versions of the associated nonlinear models. There are a range of different approaches by which it is possible to solve the dynamics of nonlinear models with the saddle-path property. Alternative solution methods using numerical techniques are discussed. In all cases, the success of the solution can be assessed by evaluating whether or not the chosen solution gives a time-path for each variable that goes from the chosen initial condition to (a small neighborhood of) the steady-state. Unfortunately, however, there is generally no way of evaluating whether intermediate points on the path between the initial condition and the steady-state are close approximations to the “true” solution. In order to evaluate the “goodness-of-fit” along the entire dynamic path, it is necessary to have a closed-form solution of the entire solution path. This can only be achieved in special cases. For one special case, we demonstrate how it is possible to construct a model with complex-valued eigenvalues with large imaginary parts and hence significant cycles. Such a model can be employed as a benchmark to compare the properties of solutions derived using a range of solution algorithms.

Suggested Citation

  • Stemp, Peter J. & Herbert, Ric D., 2008. "Comparing different approaches for solving optimizing models with significant nonlinearities," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 78(2), pages 357-366.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:matcom:v:78:y:2008:i:2:p:357-366
    DOI: 10.1016/j.matcom.2008.01.009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378475408000487
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.matcom.2008.01.009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter J. Stemp, 2005. "Finding an Example of an Optimising Agent with Cyclical Behaviour," Computing in Economics and Finance 2005 4, Society for Computational Economics.
    2. Kenneth L. Judd, 1998. "Numerical Methods in Economics," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262100711, April.
    3. Stephen J. Turnovsky, 2000. "Methods of Macroeconomic Dynamics, 2nd Edition," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 2, volume 1, number 0262201232, April.
    4. Herbert, Ric D. & Stemp, Peter J. & Griffiths, William E., 2005. "Assessing two common approaches for solving models with saddle-path instabilities," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 78-89.
    5. Peter Stemp & Ric Herbert, 2006. "Solving Non-Linear Models with Saddle-Path Instabilities," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 28(2), pages 211-231, September.
    6. Blanchard, Olivier Jean & Kahn, Charles M, 1980. "The Solution of Linear Difference Models under Rational Expectations," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 48(5), pages 1305-1311, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Herbert, Ric D. & Stemp, Peter J., 2009. "Solving a non-linear model: The importance of model specification for deriving a suitable solution," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 79(9), pages 2847-2855.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Herbert, Ric D. & Stemp, Peter J., 2009. "Solving a non-linear model: The importance of model specification for deriving a suitable solution," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 79(9), pages 2847-2855.
    2. Herbert, Ric D. & Stemp, Peter J., 2011. "Solving macroeconomic models with “off-the-shelf” software: An example of potential pitfalls," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 81(7), pages 1375-1384.
    3. Peter Stemp & Ric Herbert, 2006. "Solving Non-Linear Models with Saddle-Path Instabilities," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 28(2), pages 211-231, September.
    4. Gomme, Paul & Klein, Paul, 2011. "Second-order approximation of dynamic models without the use of tensors," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 604-615, April.
    5. Mario Miranda, 2005. "Teaching Computational Economics in an Applied Economics Program," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 25(3), pages 229-254, June.
    6. Ajevskis Viktors, 2017. "Semi-global solutions to DSGE models: perturbation around a deterministic path," Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics, De Gruyter, vol. 21(2), pages 1-28, April.
    7. John Stachurski, 2009. "Economic Dynamics: Theory and Computation," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262012774, April.
    8. Lan, Hong & Meyer-Gohde, Alexander, 2012. "Existence and Uniqueness of Perturbation Solutions in DSGE Models," Dynare Working Papers 14, CEPREMAP.
    9. Aruoba, S. Boragan & Fernandez-Villaverde, Jesus & Rubio-Ramirez, Juan F., 2006. "Comparing solution methods for dynamic equilibrium economies," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 30(12), pages 2477-2508, December.
    10. Francisco A. Gallego & Klaus Schmidt-Hebbel & Luis Servén, 2004. "General Equilibrium Dynamics of External Shocks and Policy Changes in Chile," Working Papers Central Bank of Chile 271, Central Bank of Chile.
    11. Schmitt-Grohe, Stephanie & Uribe, Martin, 2004. "Solving dynamic general equilibrium models using a second-order approximation to the policy function," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 755-775, January.
    12. Pedro Garcia Duarte, 2011. "Recent Developments in Macroeconomics: The DSGE Approach to Business Cycles in Perspective," Chapters, in: John B. Davis & D. Wade Hands (ed.), The Elgar Companion to Recent Economic Methodology, chapter 16, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    13. Lars E O Svensson, 2005. "Monetary Policy with Judgment: Forecast Targeting," International Journal of Central Banking, International Journal of Central Banking, vol. 1(1), May.
    14. Francesco Bianchi & Giovanni Nicolò, 2021. "A generalized approach to indeterminacy in linear rational expectations models," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 12(3), pages 843-868, July.
    15. Kato, Ryo & Nishiyama, Shin-Ichi, 2005. "Optimal monetary policy when interest rates are bounded at zero," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 29(1-2), pages 97-133, January.
    16. Kollmann, Robert, 2020. "Rational Bubbles in Non-Linear Business Cycle Models: Closed and Open Economies," CEPR Discussion Papers 14367, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    17. Schesch, Constantin, 2024. "Pseudospectral methods for continuous-time heterogeneous-agent models," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    18. Posch, Olaf & Trimborn, Timo, 2013. "Numerical solution of dynamic equilibrium models under Poisson uncertainty," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 37(12), pages 2602-2622.
    19. Viktors Ajevskis, 2019. "Generalised Impulse Response Function as a Perturbation of a Global Solution to DSGE Models," Working Papers 2019/04, Latvijas Banka.
    20. Isaiah Hull & Or Sattath & Eleni Diamanti & Göran Wendin, 2024. "Quantum Technology for Economists," Contributions to Economics, Springer, number 978-3-031-50780-9, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:matcom:v:78:y:2008:i:2:p:357-366. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/mathematics-and-computers-in-simulation/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.