IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/matcom/v53y2000i4p259-271.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modelling for fault detection and isolation versus modelling for control

Author

Listed:
  • Frank, P.M.
  • Alcorta Garcı́a, E.
  • Köppen-Seliger, B.

Abstract

The goal of this paper is to emphasize both the particularities of models needed for model-based fault detection and isolation (FDI) and the differences with respect to the models used in control. Of special interest is the question of complexity. This depends basically on the given situation such as the kind of plant, the kind and number of faults to be detected, the demands for fault isolation, robustness and the measurements available. However, in contrast to the wide-spread opinion that models for FDI have always to be more complex than those for control, the paper shows that diagnostic models for controllable and observable plants comprise only a partial description of the input/output model and are therefore less complex than those for control. This issue is discussed in terms of different model-based FDI approaches — analytical, data- and knowledge-based. As for the analytical approaches the necessary order of the diagnostic model is that of the transfer operator from the fault vector to the system output.

Suggested Citation

  • Frank, P.M. & Alcorta Garcı́a, E. & Köppen-Seliger, B., 2000. "Modelling for fault detection and isolation versus modelling for control," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 53(4), pages 259-271.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:matcom:v:53:y:2000:i:4:p:259-271
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378475400002123
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:matcom:v:53:y:2000:i:4:p:259-271. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/mathematics-and-computers-in-simulation/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.