IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/matcom/v156y2019icp158-177.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative study of the lattice Boltzmann collision models for simulation of incompressible fluid flows

Author

Listed:
  • Ezzatneshan, Eslam

Abstract

In this paper, several lattice Boltzmann (LB) collision models are evaluated by a comparative study for simulation of incompressible fluid flows with periodic and also with curved wall boundaries. Herein, the single-relaxation-time (SRT) scheme based on the Bhatnagar–Gross–Krook (BGK) approximation, multiple-relaxation-time (MRT), regularized lattice Boltzmann (RLB) and the entropic lattice Boltzmann (ELB) methods are considered. The doubly periodic shear layers flow problem is computed in two different Reynolds numbers to investigate the robustness and performance of the collision operators applied. Efficiency and accuracy of these techniques are also examined by computing the incompressible fluid flows around a circular cylinder at various flow conditions. The predicted results are compared with the experiments and the numerical results performed by other researchers. The present study demonstrates that the SRT model is accurate enough and efficient for simulation of fluid flows with low Reynolds numbers. This scheme, however, suffers from numerical instabilities at moderate Reynolds numbers and requires very fine grid resolutions to remain stable. It is found that the ELB scheme does not sufficiently reduce the numerical oscillation at high Reynolds number flows. This method provides fewer stability benefits while being more computationally expensive. The results obtained show that the MRT and RLB models are stable (in contrast to SRT and ELB) for all the cases considered in the present work even at high Reynolds numbers. In terms of computational efficiency and accuracy, the MRT and RLB schemes are more attractive and provide the results comparable to those of other experimental and numerical methods. The present study suggests that these two techniques based on the implementation of the lattice Boltzmann method are robust, sufficiently accurate and computationally efficient to resolve the flow structures and properties around the practical geometries even at high Reynolds numbers.

Suggested Citation

  • Ezzatneshan, Eslam, 2019. "Comparative study of the lattice Boltzmann collision models for simulation of incompressible fluid flows," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 158-177.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:matcom:v:156:y:2019:i:c:p:158-177
    DOI: 10.1016/j.matcom.2018.07.013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378475418301976
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.matcom.2018.07.013?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Djukic, Tijana & Topalovic, Marko & Filipovic, Nenad, 2023. "Validation of lattice Boltzmann based software for blood flow simulations in complex patient-specific arteries against traditional CFD methods," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 957-976.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:matcom:v:156:y:2019:i:c:p:158-177. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/mathematics-and-computers-in-simulation/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.