IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/marpol/v59y2015icp53-60.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Offshore installations, decommissioning and artificial reefs: Do current legal frameworks best serve the marine environment?

Author

Listed:
  • Techera, Erika J.
  • Chandler, John

Abstract

The offshore oil and gas industry is facing the prospect of de-commissioning thousands of installations in the coming decades. In some parts of the world the issue is already pressing. The financial cost of complete removal is significant, and therefore the prospect of leaving part of the installation in situ is attractive. The way forward, though, is not clear. Despite the success of rigs-to-reef projects in the US it is unclear whether such initiatives are transferable to other contexts given very different physical and jurisdictional contexts. This paper explores current legal frameworks including international law and the state of play in Australia compared with that in the US and UK. Tentative recommendations are made for future developments in this area.

Suggested Citation

  • Techera, Erika J. & Chandler, John, 2015. "Offshore installations, decommissioning and artificial reefs: Do current legal frameworks best serve the marine environment?," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 53-60.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:marpol:v:59:y:2015:i:c:p:53-60
    DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2015.04.021
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X15001037
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.marpol.2015.04.021?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Noor Amila Wan Abdullah Zawawi & Kamaluddeen Usman Danyaro & M. S. Liew & Lim Eu Shawn, 2023. "Environmental Sustainability and Efficiency of Offshore Platform Decommissioning: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-18, August.
    2. Huyen Thi Le & Janet Xuanli Liao & Christopher J. Spray, 2021. "Decommissioning Planning of Offshore Oil and Gas Fields in Vietnam: What Can be Learnt from Mine Closure Planning in Scotland?," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 11(4), pages 162-174.
    3. Abdo, Hafez & Mangena, Musa & Needham, Graham & Hunt, David, 2018. "Disclosure of provisions for decommissioning costs in annual reports of oil and gas companies: A content analysis and stakeholder views," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 42(4), pages 341-358.
    4. Anaëlle J. Lemasson & Paul J. Somerfield & Michaela Schratzberger & Murray S. A. Thompson & Louise B. Firth & Elena Couce & C. Louise McNeill & Joana Nunes & Christine Pascoe & Stephen C. L. Watson & , 2024. "A global meta-analysis of ecological effects from offshore marine artificial structures," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 7(4), pages 485-495, April.
    5. Lucia Margheritini & Giuseppina Colaleo & Pasquale Contestabile & Trine Larsen Bjørgård & Morten Enggrob Simonsen & Caterina Lanfredi & Antonio Dell’Anno & Diego Vicinanza, 2020. "Development of an Eco-Sustainable Solution for the Second Life of Decommissioned Oil and Gas Platforms: The Mineral Accretion Technology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-17, May.
    6. Sedlar, D. Karasalihović & Vulin, D. & Krajačić, G. & Jukić, L., 2019. "Offshore gas production infrastructure reutilisation for blue energy production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 159-174.
    7. Leporini, Mariella & Marchetti, Barbara & Corvaro, Francesco & Polonara, Fabio, 2019. "Reconversion of offshore oil and gas platforms into renewable energy sites production: Assessment of different scenarios," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 1121-1132.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:marpol:v:59:y:2015:i:c:p:53-60. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/marpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.