IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/marpol/v56y2015icp56-60.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Further action on bycatch could boost United States fisheries performance

Author

Listed:
  • Pelc, Robin A.
  • Max, Lisa M.
  • Norden, Wendy
  • Roberts, Santi
  • Silverstein, Rachel
  • Wilding, Sam R.

Abstract

This paper examines the sustainability of United States fisheries managed under the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, the law that provides the framework for federal fisheries management. Sustainability across a broad suite of criteria, including health of the fished stock, bycatch, and effects on the habitat and ecosystem, was measured against the Monterey Bay Aquarium׳s Seafood Watch criteria for ecological sustainability. Seafood Watch ratings and numerical scores for U.S. federally managed fisheries were analyzed to elucidate strengths and weaknesses among federally-managed fisheries. Of U.S. federally managed fisheries assessed by Seafood Watch, only 2% are rated “Avoid”, and strong ratings for stock health for nearly all fisheries indicate that the Magnuson-Stevens Act is fundamentally succeeding at maintaining or rebuilding the abundance of targeted stocks. The majority (79%) of U.S. fisheries earn the intermediate rating of “Good Alternative”, and 19% earn the top rating of “Best Choice”. Given that U.S. fisheries management is considered among the strongest in the world, this analysis assesses why the majority of U.S. fisheries are not rated “Best Choice”. Fisheries for all variety of species, and using a wide range of fishing methods, can merit “Best Choice” status. However, the majority of U.S. fisheries do not achieve this rating due primarily to bycatch concerns. By improving performance with regard to bycatch, most “Good Alternative” U.S. federal fisheries could reach “Best Choice” status and reap rewards in the marketplace for that recognition. Findings suggest that current science-based management should be maintained in the Magnuson-Stevens Act reauthorization, managers should adopt best practices based on fisheries that are already performing well in the U.S., and more specific federal bycatch mitigation requirements should be implemented.

Suggested Citation

  • Pelc, Robin A. & Max, Lisa M. & Norden, Wendy & Roberts, Santi & Silverstein, Rachel & Wilding, Sam R., 2015. "Further action on bycatch could boost United States fisheries performance," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 56-60.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:marpol:v:56:y:2015:i:c:p:56-60
    DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2015.02.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X15000275
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.marpol.2015.02.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Moore, Jeffrey E. & Wallace, Bryan P. & Lewison, Rebecca L. & Zydelis, Ramúnas & Cox, Tara M. & Crowder, Larry B., 2009. "A review of marine mammal, sea turtle and seabird bycatch in USA fisheries and the role of policy in shaping management," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 435-451, May.
    2. Pitcher, Tony J. & Kalikoski, Daniela & Short, Katherine & Varkey, Divya & Pramod, Ganapathiraju, 2009. "An evaluation of progress in implementing ecosystem-based management of fisheries in 33 countries," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 223-232, March.
    3. Oremus, Kimberly Lai & Suatoni, Lisa & Sewell, Brad, 2014. "The requirement to rebuild US fish stocks: Is it working?," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 71-75.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Long, Rachel D. & Charles, Anthony & Stephenson, Robert L., 2015. "Key principles of marine ecosystem-based management," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 53-60.
    2. Yates, K.L., 2014. "View from the wheelhouse: Perceptions on marine management from the fishing community and suggestions for improvement," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 39-50.
    3. Williams, Gary W. & Capps, Jr., Oral, 2022. "The apparent conflict of Norwegian pelagic fisheries management and Norwegian seafood council export promotion," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 25(3), February.
    4. Patrick, Wesley S. & Link, Jason S., 2015. "Hidden in plain sight: Using optimum yield as a policy framework to operationalize ecosystem-based fisheries management," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 74-81.
    5. Stefan Borsky & Paul A. Raschky, 2015. "Intergovernmental Interaction in Compliance with an International Environmental Agreement," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 2(2), pages 161-203.
    6. Jane L. Harrison & Alexandra Naumenko & John C. Whitehead, 2021. "Attribute Nonattendance And Citizen Preferences For Ecosystem‐Based Fisheries Management: The Case Of Atlantic Menhaden," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 39(2), pages 310-324, April.
    7. D. Webster, 2013. "International fisheries: assessing the potential for ecosystem management," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 3(2), pages 169-183, June.
    8. Jennifer L. Bailey, 2018. "Rethinking the oceans and their management," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 8(2), pages 189-194, June.
    9. Joshua K. Abbott & Alan C. Haynie & Matthew N. Reimer, 2015. "Hidden Flexibility: Institutions, Incentives, and the Margins of Selectivity in Fishing," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 91(1), pages 169-195.
    10. Eddy, Tyler D. & Pitcher, Tony J. & MacDiarmid, Alison B. & Byfield, Tamsen T. & Tam, Jamie C. & Jones, Timothy T. & Bell, James J. & Gardner, Jonathan P.A., 2014. "Lobsters as keystone: Only in unfished ecosystems?," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 275(C), pages 48-72.
    11. Waheed, Rida & Sarwar, Suleman & Alsaggaf, Majid Ibrahim, 2023. "Relevance of energy, green and blue factors to achieve sustainable economic growth: Empirical study of Saudi Arabia," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    12. van Hoof, Luc, 2015. "Fisheries management, the ecosystem approach, regionalisation and the elephants in the room," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 20-26.
    13. Kahui, Viktoria & Richards, Amanda C., 2014. "Lessons from resource management by indigenous Maori in New Zealand: Governing the ecosystems as a commons," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 1-7.
    14. Jimenez, Érica Antunes & Gonzalez, Júlio Guazzelli & Amaral, Marilu Teixeira & Lucena Frédou, Flávia, 2021. "Sustainability indicators for the integrated assessment of coastal small-scale fisheries in the Brazilian Amazon," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    15. Liu, Ta-Kang & Kao, Jui-Chuang & Chen, Ping, 2015. "Tragedy of the unwanted commons: Governing the marine debris in Taiwan’s oyster farming," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 123-130.
    16. Muhammad Mohsin & Yin Hengbin & Zhang Luyao & Li Rui & Qian Chong & Ana Mehak, 2022. "An Application of Multiple-Criteria Decision Analysis for Risk Prioritization and Management: A Case Study of the Fisheries Sector in Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-21, July.
    17. Helene Gomes & Coralie Kersulec & Luc Doyen & Fabian Blanchard & Abdoul Cisse & Nicolas Sanz, 2020. "Climate warming vs ecological competition for marine tropical biodiversity and fisheries," Bordeaux Economics Working Papers 2020-13, Bordeaux School of Economics (BSE).
    18. Curtis, K. Alexandra & Moore, Jeffrey E. & Boyd, Charlotte & Dillingham, Peter W. & Lewison, Rebecca L. & Taylor, Barbara L. & James, Kelsey C., 2015. "Managing catch of marine megafauna: Guidelines for setting limit reference points," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 249-263.
    19. Maxwell, Sara M. & Hazen, Elliott L. & Lewison, Rebecca L. & Dunn, Daniel C. & Bailey, Helen & Bograd, Steven J. & Briscoe, Dana K. & Fossette, Sabrina & Hobday, Alistair J. & Bennett, Meredith & Bens, 2015. "Dynamic ocean management: Defining and conceptualizing real-time management of the ocean," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 42-50.
    20. Stefan Borsky & Paul A. Raschky, 2011. "A Spatial Econometric Analysis of Compliance with an International Environmental Agreement on Open Access Resources," Working Papers 2011-10, Faculty of Economics and Statistics, Universität Innsbruck.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:marpol:v:56:y:2015:i:c:p:56-60. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/marpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.