IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/marpol/v35y2011i1p85-94.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

New Zealand's Treaty of Waitangi and the doctrine of discovery: Implications for the foreshore and seabed

Author

Listed:
  • Bess, Randall

Abstract

Since the advent of Western European exploration questions have been raised about the legality and morality of claims to new territories and the ensuing, often brutal colonisation patterns. The doctrine of discovery justified the acquisition of territories by conquest or other means. By the 19th century British common law included the doctrine of continuity, which recognised that the property rights of the indigenous people survived after the Crown acquired sovereignty over their territories. The Crown used a general treaty of cession and protection as the instrument for gaining sovereignty. In the context of Western European colonisation, this article discusses the statutory and judicial recognition of New Zealand's Treaty of Waitangi 1840 and native title to land. The ensuing discussion highlights statute and judicial decisions that depart from the Treaty and are unique within the British colonies. This article also discusses the settlement of Treaty-based claims to land and fisheries and the current debate regarding ownership of the land along the seacoast and beneath the sea. The article contributes to the broader discussion on indigenous rights.

Suggested Citation

  • Bess, Randall, 2011. "New Zealand's Treaty of Waitangi and the doctrine of discovery: Implications for the foreshore and seabed," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 85-94, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:marpol:v:35:y:2011:i:1:p:85-94
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308-597X(10)00147-8
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shaun Goldfinch, 2015. "Property rights and the mystery of capital: A review of de Soto’s simplistic solution to development," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 15(1), pages 87-96, January.
    2. Amanda Lynch & David Griggs & Lee Joachim & Jackie Walker, 2013. "The role of the Yorta Yorta people in clarifying the common interest in sustainable management of the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 46(2), pages 109-123, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:marpol:v:35:y:2011:i:1:p:85-94. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/marpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.