IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/marpol/v32y2008i6p1023-1036.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Econometric analysis of the ship demolition market

Author

Listed:
  • Knapp, Sabine
  • Kumar, Shashi N.
  • Remijn, Anna Bobo

Abstract

The topic of ship recycling has obtained considerable attention during the last two decades for a variety of reasons with the likelihood of the adoption of a new international convention under the auspices of the International Maritime Organization (IMO). This study applies econometric modeling to a unique data set to provide insight into the dynamics of the ship recycling market. The data set contains information on 51,112 ships over 100Â gt and includes 748,621 events over a period of 29 years. The analysis confirms a negative relationship of earnings and a positive relationship of scrap prices for all locations while Bangladesh seems to be more sensitive to changes in earnings than the other locations and more likely demolishes larger and older vessels. The results for flag and ownership vary across scrapping locations with Malta and Cyprus indicating potential importance from a registry perspective. The overall safety profile of a vessel seems to be less important towards the probability of a ship being scrapped. Possible implementation of the convention at EU level will mostly likely affect Turkey while non-ratification of one of the major flags will most likely affect China or Bangladesh.

Suggested Citation

  • Knapp, Sabine & Kumar, Shashi N. & Remijn, Anna Bobo, 2008. "Econometric analysis of the ship demolition market," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(6), pages 1023-1036, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:marpol:v:32:y:2008:i:6:p:1023-1036
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308-597X(08)00032-8
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nikos D. Kagkarakis & Andreas G. Merikas & Anna Merika, 2016. "Modelling and forecasting the demolition market in shipping," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(8), pages 1021-1035, November.
    2. Yujuico, Emmanuel, 2014. "Demandeur pays: The EU and funding improvements in South Asian ship recycling practices," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 340-351.
    3. Omar M. ElMenshawy & M. Ali Ülkü & Juliana Hsuan, 2024. "Navigating Green Ship Recycling: A Systematic Review and Implications for Circularity and Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-23, August.
    4. Papapostolou, Nikos C. & Pouliasis, Panos K. & Kyriakou, Ioannis, 2017. "Herd behavior in the drybulk market: an empirical analysis of the decision to invest in new and retire existing fleet capacity," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 36-51.
    5. Thanasis Karlis & Dionysios Polemis & Anastasios Georgakis, 2016. "Ship demolition activity. An evaluation of the effect of currency exchange rates on ship scrap values," SPOUDAI Journal of Economics and Business, SPOUDAI Journal of Economics and Business, University of Piraeus, vol. 66(3), pages 53-70, July-Sept.
    6. Yin, Jingbo & Fan, Lixian, 2018. "Survival analysis of the world ship demolition market," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 141-156.
    7. Keun-Sik Park & Young-Joon Seo & A-Rom Kim & Min-Ho Ha, 2018. "Ship Acquisition of Shipping Companies by Sale & Purchase Activities for Sustainable Growth: Exploratory Fuzzy-AHP Application," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-13, May.
    8. Alizadeh, Amir H. & Strandenes, Siri Pettersen & Thanopoulou, Helen, 2016. "Capacity retirement in the dry bulk market: A vessel based logit model," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 28-42.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:marpol:v:32:y:2008:i:6:p:1023-1036. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/marpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.