IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v90y2020ics0264837719308063.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Value capture mechanisms, transaction costs, and heritage conservation: A case study of Sanjiangyuan National Park, China

Author

Listed:
  • Wu, Jiayu
  • Wu, Gefei
  • Zheng, Tianli
  • Zhang, Xiaobin
  • Zhou, Kan

Abstract

Value capture has been shown to be an innovative instrument to solve the dilemma of funding shortfalls for protected areas. However, value capture mechanisms are often ineffective even though financing from the domestic budget is sufficient. This paper structures a theoretical framework to compare two value capture mechanisms (ecological compensation and ecological migration) based on implementation effects (heritage protection and welfare promotion) and transaction costs (the costs of information, bargaining, and policing). Sanjiangyuan National Park in China is adopted as an empirical case. Based on multi-source data collection and in-depth interviews, we review the ecological compensation in multiple functions and ecological migration in multiple forms for this case. Our results suggest that value capture tools have attained great achievements and dramatically changed the lives of aborigines. We then evaluate implementation effects separately: compensation for ecological regulation, bonuses for incentives, and transfer payments to the poor could all contribute to better ecological restoration and increased resident income. However, although ecological engineering accounts for the largest expenditures, it has little influence on heritage protection and welfare promotion. We also find that the transaction costs of ecological migration are significantly higher than those of ecological compensation. To our knowledge, this investigation is the first attempt to understand domestic funds for protected areas from a novel value capture perspective, and the results of this study can provide guidance for both protected area finances and policy evaluation.

Suggested Citation

  • Wu, Jiayu & Wu, Gefei & Zheng, Tianli & Zhang, Xiaobin & Zhou, Kan, 2020. "Value capture mechanisms, transaction costs, and heritage conservation: A case study of Sanjiangyuan National Park, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:90:y:2020:i:c:s0264837719308063
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104246
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837719308063
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104246?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. R. H. Coase, 2013. "The Problem of Social Cost," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 56(4), pages 837-877.
    2. Libecap, Gary D., 1986. "Property rights in economic history: Implications for research," Explorations in Economic History, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 227-252, July.
    3. Steven Tadelis & Oliver E.Williamson, 2012. "Transaction Cost Economics [The Handbook of Organizational Economics]," Introductory Chapters,, Princeton University Press.
    4. Holmstrom, Bengt & Milgrom, Paul, 1991. "Multitask Principal-Agent Analyses: Incentive Contracts, Asset Ownership, and Job Design," The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 7(0), pages 24-52, Special I.
    5. Barzel,Yoram, 1997. "Economic Analysis of Property Rights," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521597135, February.
    6. Wu, Jiayu & Hu, Yingjie & Liu, Tao & He, Qingsong, 2018. "Value capture in protected areas from the perspective of common-pool resource governance: A case study of Jiuzhai Valley National Park, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 452-462.
    7. Klein, Benjamin, 1980. "Transaction Cost Determinants of "Unfair" Contractual Arrangements," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 70(2), pages 356-362, May.
    8. Norton-Griffiths, Michael & Southey, Clive, 1995. "The opportunity costs of biodiversity conservation in Kenya," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(2), pages 125-139, February.
    9. Cernea, Michael, 1997. "The risks and reconstruction model for resettling displaced populations," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 25(10), pages 1569-1587, October.
    10. Cheung, Steven N S, 1998. "The Transaction Costs Paradigm: 1998 Presidential Address, Western Economic Association," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 36(4), pages 514-521, October.
    11. Southgate, Douglas & Sierra, Rodrigo & Brown, Lawrence, 1991. "The causes of tropical deforestation in Ecuador: A statistical analysis," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 19(9), pages 1145-1151, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wu, Jiayu & Wu, Gefei & Kong, Xinyu & Luo, Yiling & Zhang, Xiaobin, 2020. "Why should landowners in protected areas be compensated? A theoretical framework based on value capture," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    2. Ting Ma & Brent Swallow & J. Marc Foggin & Linsheng Zhong & Weiguo Sang, 2023. "Co-management for sustainable development and conservation in Sanjiangyuan National Park and the surrounding Tibetan nomadic pastoralist areas," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-13, December.
    3. Andrew Rule & Sarah-Eve Dill & Gordy Sun & Aidan Chen & Senan Khawaja & Ingrid Li & Vincent Zhang & Scott Rozelle, 2022. "Challenges and Opportunities in Aligning Conservation with Development in China’s National Parks: A Narrative Literature Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-24, October.
    4. Wei Zhang & Liang Zhou & Yan Zhang & Zhijie Chen & Fengning Hu, 2022. "Impacts of Ecological Migration on Land Use and Vegetation Restoration in Arid Zones," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-19, June.
    5. Xianyang Liu & Qingwen Min & Wenjun Jiao, 2022. "Revealing Changes in the Management Capacity of the Three-River-Source National Park, China: An Application of the Best Practice-Based Evaluation Method," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-17, September.
    6. Dimitrios Kalfas & Fotios Chatzitheodoridis & Efstratios Loizou & Katerina Melfou, 2022. "Willingness to Pay for Urban and Suburban Green," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-21, February.
    7. Ting Ma & Kun Xu & Yiming Xing & Hang Shu & Weiguo Sang, 2020. "Tendencies of Residents in Sanjiangyuan National Park to the Optimization of Livelihoods and Conservation of the Natural Reserves," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-17, June.
    8. Abdu, Nizam & Tinch, Elena & Levitt, Clinton & Volker, Peter W. & Hatton MacDonald, Darla, 2022. "Illegal firewood collection in Tasmania: Approaching the problem with the Institutional Analysis and Development (IAD) framework," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    9. Rui Wang & Yuan Gao, 2022. "An Evaluation of Factors Influencing Urban Integration and Livelihood of Eco-Migrant Families: Quantitative Evidence from Western China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-14, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Katja Kalkschmied, 2020. "Rebundling Institutions," Graz Economics Papers 2020-03, University of Graz, Department of Economics.
    2. Kirsten Foss & Nicolai Foss, 2001. "Assets, Attributes and Ownership," International Journal of the Economics of Business, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 19-37.
    3. Hongyun Han & Hanning Li, 2018. "The Distribution of Residual Controls and Risk Sharing: A Case Study of Farmland Transfer in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-20, June.
    4. Wu, Jiayu & Hu, Yingjie & Liu, Tao & He, Qingsong, 2018. "Value capture in protected areas from the perspective of common-pool resource governance: A case study of Jiuzhai Valley National Park, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 452-462.
    5. Maloney, Michael T., 2017. "Alchian remembrances," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 561-582.
    6. Nicolai J. Foss & Peter G. Klein & Lasse B. Lien & Thomas Zellweger & Todd Zenger, 2021. "Ownership competence," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(2), pages 302-328, February.
    7. Schmid, Andreas, 2007. "Incentive Compatibility and Efficiency in the contractual Insurer-Provider Relationship: Economic Theory and practical Implications: The Case of North Carolina," MPRA Paper 23311, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2008.
    8. Thomas Vendryes, 2014. "Peasants Against Private Property Rights: A Review Of The Literature," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(5), pages 971-995, December.
    9. Molinari, Marco & Anund Vogel, Jonas & Rolando, Davide & Lundqvist, Per, 2023. "Using living labs to tackle innovation bottlenecks: the KTH Live-In Lab case study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 338(C).
    10. Max Zongyuan Shang & Ken McEwan, 2021. "The make‐or‐buy decision of feed on livestock farms: Evidence from Ontario swine farms," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 69(3), pages 353-368, September.
    11. Oleksandr Sushchenko & Reimund Schwarze, 2016. "Carbon taxation and market financial instruments for mobilizing climate finance," Discussion Paper Series RECAP15 23, RECAP15, European University Viadrina, Frankfurt (Oder).
    12. Mehrdad Vahabi, 2011. "Appropriation, violent enforcement, and transaction costs: a critical survey," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 147(1), pages 227-253, April.
    13. Robert Gibbons & John Roberts, 2012. "The Handbook of Organizational Economics," Economics Books, Princeton University Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 9889.
    14. repec:vuw:vuwscr:19035 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Vítor Gaspar, 2010. "Financial Stability and Policy Cooperation," Working Papers o201001, Banco de Portugal, Economics and Research Department.
    16. Gerald Friedman, "undated". "The Sanctity of Property Rights in American History," Working Papers wp14, Political Economy Research Institute, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
    17. Justus Haucap & Christian Wey, 1999. "Standortwahl als Franchisingproblem," CIG Working Papers FS IV 99-08, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin (WZB), Research Unit: Competition and Innovation (CIG).
    18. Benito Arruñada & Giorgio Zanarone & Nuno Garoupa, 2019. "Property Rights in Sequential Exchange," The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 35(1), pages 127-153.
    19. Mueller, Bernardo, 2022. "Property rights and violence in indigenous land in Brazil," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    20. Ruda Zhang & Roger Ghanem, 2020. "Multi-market Oligopoly of Equal Capacity," Papers 2012.06742, arXiv.org.
    21. Christian Balcells, 2022. "Determinants of firm boundaries and organizational performance: an empirical investigation of the Chilean truck market," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 32(2), pages 423-461, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:90:y:2020:i:c:s0264837719308063. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.