IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v89y2019ics0264837718302886.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stakeholder motivation for the conservation of sacred groves in south India: An analysis of environmental perceptions of rural and urban neighbourhood communities

Author

Listed:
  • Prashanth Ballullaya, U.
  • Reshmi, K.S.
  • Rajesh, T.P.
  • Manoj, K.
  • Lowman, Margaret
  • Allesh Sinu, Palatty

Abstract

Sacred groves (SGs) of south India are the local communities’ self-enforced spiritual institutions, which contain natural forests and swamps. Thus, the communities’ faith in traditional rituals and local deities are important for their existence. SGs preserve cultural practices of ethnic communities and conserve biodiversity. Although most of these groves can be found in rural areas, rapid urban annexation is changing their landscapes. We hypothesise that the landscape type (rural versus urban) and the deity type of the SGs among other factors might affect the communities’ spiritual and environmental perceptions of SGs. This study was conducted in rural highlands of the Western Ghats in Kodagu and adjoining urban lowlands in Kasaragod. We found that the urban communities valued SGs, not only for their spiritual importance but also for their environmental merits. Both urban and rural communities were cautious enough not to access or abuse the SGs. This behaviour also depended on the deity that was housed in the SG. SGs that housed highly revered deities (eg. naga) were seldom abused. The religious adherence was prominent especially in rural communities, so much so that the habitat quality of the SGs could be predicted based on the deity that was worshipped there. Apart from these spiritual influences, SGs are influenced by economic (coffee industry in Kodagu) and societal pressures. Sanskritization of deities or change in faith, construction of temples, land encroachments, and changes in the neighbouring societies also negatively affect the SGs. Since the SGs receive reverence on the power of the local deities, governmental bodies must discourage the Sanskritization of local deities and construction of temples. Considering the historical, biological, and cultural importance of SGs, the policies governing them is necessary to ensure that SGs stay intact.

Suggested Citation

  • Prashanth Ballullaya, U. & Reshmi, K.S. & Rajesh, T.P. & Manoj, K. & Lowman, Margaret & Allesh Sinu, Palatty, 2019. "Stakeholder motivation for the conservation of sacred groves in south India: An analysis of environmental perceptions of rural and urban neighbourhood communities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:89:y:2019:i:c:s0264837718302886
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104213
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837718302886
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104213?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. M.G. Chandrakanth & Mahadev G. Bhat & M.S. Accavva, 2004. "Socio‐economic changes and sacred groves in South India: Protecting a community‐based resource management institution," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 28(2), pages 102-111, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ndidzulafhi Innocent Sinthumule & Thendo Mugwena & Mulalo Rabumbulu, 2021. "The Conflict between Preserving a ‘Sacred Natural Site’ and Exploiting Nature for Commercial Gain: Evidence from Phiphidi Waterfall in South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-15, September.
    2. Kweon, Deogkyu & Youn, Yeo-Chang, 2021. "Factors influencing sustainability of traditional village groves (Maeulsoop) in Korea," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Melvani, Kamal & Myers, the Late Bronwyn & Stacey, Natasha & Bristow, Mila & Crase, Beth & Moles, Jerry, 2022. "Farmers’ values for land, trees and biodiversity underlie agricultural sustainability," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    2. Ndidzulafhi Innocent Sinthumule, 2022. "Conservation Effects of Governance and Management of Sacred Natural Sites: Lessons from Vhutanda in the Vhembe Region, Limpopo Province of South Africa," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-12, January.
    3. Ndidzulafhi Innocent Sinthumule & Thendo Mugwena & Mulalo Rabumbulu, 2021. "The Conflict between Preserving a ‘Sacred Natural Site’ and Exploiting Nature for Commercial Gain: Evidence from Phiphidi Waterfall in South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-15, September.
    4. Kabita Baral, 2024. "Revisiting Decentralised Governance of Natural Resources in India: Conceptual Binaries and Restrictive Policy Design," Journal of Development Policy and Practice, , vol. 9(2), pages 219-237, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:89:y:2019:i:c:s0264837718302886. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.