IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v152y2025ics0264837725000389.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Limits to local democracy in practice? The case of governing sustainable land use in Norwegian municipalities

Author

Listed:
  • Moberg, Karen Richardsen

Abstract

The article investigates governance processes’ performance in securing sustainable land use in Norwegian municipalities, drawing on a survey sent out to decision-makers combined with in-depth interviews with decision-makers and local stakeholders. Local governance processes have to date been unsuccessful in securing environmentally sustainable land use in the investigated municipalities for several reasons. First, environmental concerns lose out in goal conflicts with competing societal concerns. Second, the gradual character of processes building down nature makes it difficult to recognise the accumulated environmental cost. Third, forces beyond municipal control drive a certain kind of development at the expense of nature. Fourth, there is limited power and capacity in the land use planning system to govern effectively. Finally, there are inequities in the capacity and power of individual actors to influence local land use, putting the commons and key democratic principles under pressure. The article points to several challenges in the current model of local land use governance when it comes to securing legitimacy and environmental justice, most importantly the issue of current institutions and practices empowering the already powerful, at the expense of the natural resources the system is supposed to safeguard. The discussion questions the ability of the current model of governance to secure environmentally sustainable land use and suggests ways in which land use governance may be changed to better secure sustainable land use.

Suggested Citation

  • Moberg, Karen Richardsen, 2025. "Limits to local democracy in practice? The case of governing sustainable land use in Norwegian municipalities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:152:y:2025:i:c:s0264837725000389
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107505
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837725000389
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107505?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:152:y:2025:i:c:s0264837725000389. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.