IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v151y2025ics0264837725000274.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comprehensive framework for evaluating ecosystem quality changes and human activity contributions in Inner Mongolia and Xinjiang, China

Author

Listed:
  • Mumtaz, Faisal
  • Li, Jing
  • Liu, Qinhuo
  • Dong, Yadong
  • Liu, Chang
  • Gu, Chenpeng
  • Zhang, Hu
  • Zhao, Jing
  • Akhtar, Mobeen
  • Bashir, Barjeece
  • Xiaohan, Wang
  • Tariq, Aqil
  • Hussan, Hammad Ul
  • Li, Guan

Abstract

Human activities increasingly shape ecosystems, raising critical questions about sustainability and the trade-offs between ecosystem quality and ecosystem services. This study develops a comprehensive framework to evaluate ecosystem quality change (KEQI) changes driven by land use land cover (LULC) shifts and human activities (HA), along with their impacts on ecosystem service values (ESV) in Inner Mongolia and Xinjiang, two ecologically significant regions in China. The framework integrates five analytical approaches: (i) analyzing LULC dynamics using the Land Change Modeler for Ecological Sustainability (LCMES) and hotspot analysis to identify areas of significant change; (ii) assessing LULC impacts on ecosystem services values using remote sensing data; (iii) separating human activities and climate change contributions through improved residual trend analysis and pixel-based partial correlation coefficients; (iv) evaluating KEQI changes via retention rates and the Ecological Quality Change Rate; and (v) exploring relationships among KEQI, LULC, HA, and ESV using curve-fitting linear regression. The study reveals notable land-use changes, with croplands, grasslands, and urban areas expanding at the cost of bare land, driven largely by human activities, accounting for 93 % in Inner Mongolia and 89 % in Xinjiang. Regions dominated by human activities observe significant KEQI improvements, with values increasing by 13.5–16.6, particularly in Inner Mongolia. However, these improvements often coincided with declining ESV, notably grasslands in Inner Mongolia (-4.92 %) and croplands in Xinjiang. Some areas showed modest ESV increases (+0.88 %). This study underscores the intricate balance between HA, KEQI, and ESV, offering critical insights for sustainable land management in China. Policymakers can use these findings to manage land-use transitions better, align human activities with conservation goals, and promote ecosystem resilience amidst escalating land-use pressures.

Suggested Citation

  • Mumtaz, Faisal & Li, Jing & Liu, Qinhuo & Dong, Yadong & Liu, Chang & Gu, Chenpeng & Zhang, Hu & Zhao, Jing & Akhtar, Mobeen & Bashir, Barjeece & Xiaohan, Wang & Tariq, Aqil & Hussan, Hammad Ul & Li, , 2025. "A comprehensive framework for evaluating ecosystem quality changes and human activity contributions in Inner Mongolia and Xinjiang, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:151:y:2025:i:c:s0264837725000274
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107494
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837725000274
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107494?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:151:y:2025:i:c:s0264837725000274. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.