IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v132y2023ics0264837723002491.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Land observatories, discourses and struggles beyond the smokescreen. A case study in Senegal

Author

Listed:
  • Grislain, Quentin
  • Bourgoin, Jeremy

Abstract

Sub-Saharan Africa is confronted with land issues such as the private appropriation of farmland, land use conflicts, and access to land for women and younger generations. These diverse issues and the promotion of evidence-based policies encourage actors in land reform to equip themselves with steering, evaluation, and monitoring tools capable of producing information to accompany decision-making processes for land policy. Land observatories are viewed as mechanisms of information production and diffusion that can inform choices and help in these processes. In this context, they also occupy a central place in the international development discourse among research institutes, national institutions, and civil society organizations. This is generally the case in Africa where the concept of land observatories has had undeniable success in the development field in recent years. This success is manifest in the establishment of national land observatories in Madagascar (2007), Cameroun (2013, 2019), South Africa and Burkina Faso (2014), Senegal (2015), Mali (2017), and Uganda (2018). Our research uses a case study in Senegal to analyze the discrepancy between the discourse and the practices surrounding land observatories and to explore the actors' games and the institutional power-plays involved in their implementation. We also discuss the ability of these instruments to actually reduce informational asymmetries, produce and share knowledge, and improve land governance. In order to examine the reality of the land observatories rather than what they pretend to be or do, we have developed a qualitative research approach which combines the perspectives of science and technology studies, political geography, and the sociology of public action.

Suggested Citation

  • Grislain, Quentin & Bourgoin, Jeremy, 2023. "Land observatories, discourses and struggles beyond the smokescreen. A case study in Senegal," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:132:y:2023:i:c:s0264837723002491
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106783
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837723002491
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106783?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Quentin Grislain & Jeremy Bourgoin & Ward Anseeuw & Perrine Burnod & Eva Hershaw & Djibril Diop, 2020. "Going Beyond Panaceas: The Diversity of Land Observatory Forms in Africa," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-16, March.
    2. Maya Bacache-Beauvallet, 2016. "4. Management public et logique de gestion dans l’administration : quel bilan ?," Reflets et perspectives de la vie économique, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(1), pages 62-72.
    3. Maya Bacache-Beauvallet, 2016. "4. Management public et logique de gestion dans l’administration : quel bilan ?," Regards croisés sur l'économie, La Découverte, vol. 0(1), pages 62-72.
    4. Jeremy Bourgoin & Elodie Valette & Simon Guillouet & Djibril Diop & Djiby Dia, 2019. "Improving Transparency and Reliability of Tenure Information for Improved Land Governance in Senegal," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-17, February.
    5. Pirotte, Gautier, 2010. "La notion de société civile dans les politiques et pratiques du développement," Revue de la Régulation - Capitalisme, institutions, pouvoirs, Association Recherche et Régulation, vol. 7.
    6. Béatrice Van Haeperen, 2012. "Que sont les principes du New Public Management devenus ?. Le cas de l'administration régionale wallonne," Reflets et perspectives de la vie économique, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(2), pages 83-99.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bourgoin, Jeremy & Diop, Djibril & Jahel, Camille & Interdonato, Roberto & Grislain, Quentin, 2023. "Beyond land grabbing narratives, acknowledging patterns and regimes of land control in Senegal," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    2. Bourgoin, Jeremy & Diop, Djibril & Touré, Labaly & Grislain, Quentin & Interdonato, Roberto & Dieye, Mohamadou & Corniaux, Christian & Meunier, Julien & Dia, Djiby & Seck, Sidy M., 2022. "Beyond controversy, putting a livestock footprint on the map of the Senegal River delta," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    3. Houda El Mohafidi & Khaddouj Karim, 2023. "The relation of the new public management perspectives to service quality within public establishments and enterprises: A theoretical approach," Post-Print hal-04156099, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:132:y:2023:i:c:s0264837723002491. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.