IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/juipol/v94y2025ics0957178725000141.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do independent regulatory authorities impact electricity supply in Sub-Saharan Africa?

Author

Listed:
  • Kogueda, Franky BA
  • Bassongui, Nassibou
  • Bendoma, Marius

Abstract

This article assesses the impact of independent regulation on electricity supply, using data from 40 Sub-Saharan African countries over the period 2000 to 2021. Based on the propensity score matching method, we estimate the average effect of independent regulation. The results show that independent regulation positively impacts electricity generation, access to electricity, and service demand coverage. However, we find that independent regulatory authorities have no significant effect on electricity losses. A heterogeneity analysis by regional sub-blocks highlights that independent regulation enhances the allocative efficiency of electricity services in rural areas, particularly in countries experiencing social instability and insecurity. Conversely, independent regulatory authorities do not significantly affect the productive efficiency of electricity operators. These findings support the development of regulatory frameworks through the establishment of independent regulatory bodies, rural electrification initiatives, and competition authorities.

Suggested Citation

  • Kogueda, Franky BA & Bassongui, Nassibou & Bendoma, Marius, 2025. "Do independent regulatory authorities impact electricity supply in Sub-Saharan Africa?," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:juipol:v:94:y:2025:i:c:s0957178725000141
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jup.2025.101899
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957178725000141
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jup.2025.101899?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:juipol:v:94:y:2025:i:c:s0957178725000141. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/utilities-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.