IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/juipol/v60y2019ic4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Non-recourse project financing for concentrated solar thermal power

Author

Listed:
  • Geroe, Steven

Abstract

Non-recourse project financing can play a significant role in scaling up total investment in concentrated solar thermal power (CSP). Non-recourse project financing is designed to identify, allocate, and mitigate risks through project structuring and contracting. These techniques can be utilised to address risks specific to CSP projects. Complementary de-risking techniques, such as debt guarantees, can facilitate non-recourse project financings at bankable levels of return in higher risk contexts. Technological advances and learning through global industry scale-up have delivered major reductions in CSP plant development costs. Ambitious CSP targets in China and other jurisdictions underpin future CSP market development. Hybrid off-take models in current utility-scale CSP projects are utilising thermal storage technology to sell rapid response dispatchable power into electricity wholesale markets at peak periods, enabling lower long-term PPA prices at other times. These developments underpin CSP as cost-competitive with solar PV with battery storage and other forms of low emissions technology. Based on an analysis of selected CSP non-recourse project financings, an emerging contractual model of non-recourse project financing risk mitigation and complementary de-risking measures is identified. While the key features of this model are applicable to large-scale projects in developing countries, it is adaptable to meet the requirements of a wide range of projects. In this way, non-recourse project financing can play a pivotal role in the feasibility of large-scale projects in a potentially critical technology for low-carbon energy development that may otherwise be difficult to finance.

Suggested Citation

  • Geroe, Steven, 2019. "Non-recourse project financing for concentrated solar thermal power," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 1-1.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:juipol:v:60:y:2019:i:c:4
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jup.2019.100937
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095717871930236X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jup.2019.100937?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pengran Zhou & Pengfei Zhou & Serhat Yüksel & Hasan Dinçer & Gülsüm Sena Uluer, 2019. "Balanced Scorecard-Based Evaluation of Sustainable Energy Investment Projects with IT2 Fuzzy Hybrid Decision Making Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-20, December.
    2. Antonella Lomoro & Giorgio Mossa & Roberta Pellegrino & Luigi Ranieri, 2020. "Optimizing Risk Allocation in Public-Private Partnership Projects by Project Finance Contracts. The Case of Put-or-Pay Contract for Stranded Posidonia Disposal in the Municipality of Bari," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-18, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:juipol:v:60:y:2019:i:c:4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/utilities-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.