IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/juipol/v49y2017icp145-155.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring and comparing the distribution of decision-making power in regulatory arrangements of the telecommunication sector in Latin America

Author

Listed:
  • González, Camilo Ignacio

Abstract

In this paper, I measure and compare the distribution of decision-making power in regulatory arrangements in the telecommunication sectors of four Latin American countries. In particular, I measure the coordination of the decision-making process and the concentration of regulatory influence. Additionally, I measure the relative influence of each actor involved in the regulatory arrangement. To perform these measurements, I introduce, refine and apply a recently developed methodology. I found that there are significant differences across countries and across types of regulation. Furthermore, I found that the sector regulator is not necessarily the most important actor in every country.

Suggested Citation

  • González, Camilo Ignacio, 2017. "Measuring and comparing the distribution of decision-making power in regulatory arrangements of the telecommunication sector in Latin America," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 145-155.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:juipol:v:49:y:2017:i:c:p:145-155
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jup.2017.04.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957178716302557
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jup.2017.04.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jacint Jordana & David Levi-Faur (ed.), 2004. "The Politics of Regulation," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 3167.
    2. repec:wbk:wbpubs:13277 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Baldwin, Robert & Scott, Colin & Hood, Christopher (ed.), 1998. "A Reader on Regulation," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198765295.
    4. Lijphart, Arend, 1971. "Comparative Politics and the Comparative Method," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 65(3), pages 682-693, September.
    5. Bindseil, Ulrich & Hantke, Cordula, 1997. "The power distribution in decision making among EU member states," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 13(1), pages 171-185, February.
    6. Colin Blackman & Lara Srivastava, 2011. "Telecommunications Regulation Handbook : Tenth Anniversary Edition," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 13278.
    7. Moran, Michael, 2002. "Review Article: Understanding the Regulatory State," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 32(2), pages 391-413, April.
    8. Jacint Jordana & David Sancho, 2004. "Regulatory Designs, Institutional Constellations and the Study of Regulatory State," Chapters, in: Jacint Jordana & David Levi-Faur (ed.), The Politics of Regulation, chapter 13, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Onyeka Osuji, 2011. "Fluidity of Regulation-CSR Nexus: The Multinational Corporate Corruption Example," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 103(1), pages 31-57, September.
    2. Isik Ozel, 2012. "The politics of de‐delegation: Regulatory (in)dependence in Turkey," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 6(1), pages 119-129, March.
    3. Cornelia Woll & Alvaro Artigas, 2007. "When trade liberalization turns into regulatory reform: The impact on business–government relations in international trade politics," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 1(2), pages 121-138, June.
    4. repec:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/8526 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Paul Roness & Koen Verhoest & Kristin Rubecksen & Muiris MacCarthaigh, 2008. "Autonomy and Regulation of State Agencies: Reinforcement, Indifference or Compensation?," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 8(2), pages 155-174, June.
    6. Manuela Moschella & Eleni Tsingou, 2013. "Regulating finance after the crisis: Unveiling the different dynamics of the regulatory process," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(4), pages 407-416, December.
    7. Magnus Hörnqvist, 2015. "Regulating business or policing crime? Tracing the policy convergence between taxation and crime control at the local level," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 9(4), pages 352-366, December.
    8. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/8526 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/8526 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Cornelia Woll & Alvaro Artigas, 2007. "When Trade Liberalization Turns into Regulatory Reform: The Impact on Business-Government Relations in International Trade Politics," Post-Print hal-01071209, HAL.
    11. repec:hal:wpspec:info:hdl:2441/8526 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Mia Mahmudur Rahim, 2017. "Improving Social Responsibility in RMG Industries Through a New Governance Approach in Laws," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 143(4), pages 807-826, July.
    13. King, Roger, 2006. "Analysing the higher education regulatory state," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 36119, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    14. Jacint Jordana, 2005. "Book Review: Globalizing Regulatory Capitalism," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 598(1), pages 184-190, March.
    15. Christel Koop & Martin Lodge, 2017. "What is regulation? An interdisciplinary concept analysis," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(1), pages 95-108, March.
    16. Graeme A. Hodge, 2013. "Rethinking the state through the lens of regulatory governance," Chapters, in: John Farrar & David G. Mayes (ed.), Globalisation, the Global Financial Crisis and the State, chapter 9, pages 197-217, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    17. Petteri Repo & Kaisa Matschoss, 2019. "Social Innovation for Sustainability Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.
    18. Bas van Aarle & Jacob Engwerda & Joseph Plasmans, 2002. "Monetary and Fiscal Policy Interaction in the EMU: A Dynamic Game Approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 109(1), pages 229-264, January.
    19. Abdul G. Noury & Gérard Roland, 2002. "More power to the European Parliament? [‘Nice try: Should the Treaty of Nice be ratified’?]," Economic Policy, CEPR, CESifo, Sciences Po;CES;MSH, vol. 17(35), pages 279-319.
    20. Jennifer Robinson, 2011. "Cities in a World of Cities: The Comparative Gesture," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(1), pages 1-23, January.
    21. Gustav Lidén, 2013. "What about theory? The consequences on a widened perspective of social theory," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 213-225, January.
    22. Zaporozhets, Vera & García-Valiñas, María & Kurz, Sascha, 2016. "Key drivers of EU budget allocation: Does power matter?," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 57-70.
    23. Gisselquist, Rachel M., 2020. "How the cases you choose affect the answers you get, revisited," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    24. Nai Rui Chng, 2012. "Regulatory mobilization and service delivery at the edge of the regulatory state," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 6(3), pages 344-361, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:juipol:v:49:y:2017:i:c:p:145-155. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/utilities-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.