IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jouret/v101y2025i1p40-54.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Too assertive to recommend: The effect of assertive tone on referral behavior

Author

Listed:
  • Deng, Huixin
  • Yang, Shaoguang
  • Jin, Liyin

Abstract

Brands and retailers are increasingly adopting referral reward programs (RRPs) as a customer acquisition strategy. RRPs provide existing customers with referral messages and incentivize them to share those messages with other potential customers. Despite their growing popularity, there is a limited understanding of how to effectively promote RRPs, especially with regard to message tone assertiveness. In a large-scale field experiment (N = 61,401, Study 1), we discovered that consumers (i.e., senders) are less inclined to participate in referral programs when they are provided with a pregenerated referral message with a more assertive tone than when they are provided with less assertive alternatives. We found that an assertive message leads senders to anticipate greater psychological reactance from their recipients, a metaperception that diminishes their willingness to engage in RRPs (Studies 2A and 2B). Additionally, we identified two significant moderators: the detrimental effect of an assertive tone is mitigated when the product offers important benefits to recipients (Study 3) or when the referral promotion is time limited (Study 4).

Suggested Citation

  • Deng, Huixin & Yang, Shaoguang & Jin, Liyin, 2025. "Too assertive to recommend: The effect of assertive tone on referral behavior," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 101(1), pages 40-54.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jouret:v:101:y:2025:i:1:p:40-54
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jretai.2024.12.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022435924000885
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jretai.2024.12.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jouret:v:101:y:2025:i:1:p:40-54. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-retailing .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.