IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/joreco/v82y2025ics0969698924004296.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Brand extension or co-branding: The consumer's attribution of responsibility to the crossover strategies of heritage brands

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Yicong
  • Guo, Xiaoling
  • Qu, Yifan

Abstract

Cross-over brand extension and co-branding are effective innovation strategies for heritage brands to expand into new markets. This research compares consumers' responses to these two strategies, with the aim to address the gap in the literature and provide actionable insights for heritage brand managers. Based on the conceptual link between responsibility attribution and authenticity, and across four experimental studies, this research uncovers the advantage of brand extension over co-branding and its underlying mechanism: the serial mediation of responsibility attribution and new product authenticity. Meanwhile, the consumer's mindsets (fixed vs. growth) are identified as a boundary condition. Specifically, compared to brand extension, consumers attribute less responsibility to the heritage brand in co-branding; this in turn weakens the perception of new product authenticity, and leads to lower purchase intention for the new product. However, the disadvantage of co-branding will be neutralized when the consumer's growth mindset (vs. fixed mindset) is activated.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Yicong & Guo, Xiaoling & Qu, Yifan, 2025. "Brand extension or co-branding: The consumer's attribution of responsibility to the crossover strategies of heritage brands," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:joreco:v:82:y:2025:i:c:s0969698924004296
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.104133
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969698924004296
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.104133?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:joreco:v:82:y:2025:i:c:s0969698924004296. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-retailing-and-consumer-services .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.