Author
Listed:
- Xin, Baogui
- Song, Yaping
- Tan, Hui
- Peng, Wei
Abstract
The fashion industry ranks among the top polluters globally, yet the emergence of virtual worlds offers a chance for brands to switch to digital clothing as a greener option. This research explores whether the metaverse can enhance sustainability in fashion or worsen environmental issues, especially those linked to non-fungible tokens (NFTs). We introduce a game theory model to analyze the strategic dynamics between brand manufacturers and digital fashion platforms, factoring in platforms' abilities to reduce emissions. The model uncovers how these uncertainties influence pricing, investment, and performance outcomes. Our analysis is supported by a case study on DressX, a prominent digital fashion platform, showing that digital fashion brings technological innovation and environmental advantages. Platforms with greater emission reduction capacities and their collaborators witness increased revenues. However, information asymmetry complicates strategic decision-making, and the environmental implications of digital technologies underpinning the metaverse remain a critical concern. Platforms with advanced capabilities gain a competitive edge by managing costs effectively, whereas manufacturers profit at the platforms' expense. However, there is a strategic equilibrium that benefits both sides. Our study indicates that maximizing the environmental benefits of digital fashion demands responsible actions from all stakeholders, including careful technology selection, clear communication of capabilities, cost management, and strategic cooperation. Our game theory approach, combined with a real-world case study, provides a unique perspective on the strategic and environmental dynamics of digital fashion in the metaverse, contributing to the growing body of literature on sustainable fashion and digital ecosystems.
Suggested Citation
Xin, Baogui & Song, Yaping & Tan, Hui & Peng, Wei, 2025.
"Sustainable digital fashion in a metaverse ecosystem,"
Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:joreco:v:82:y:2025:i:c:s0969698924003953
DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.104099
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:joreco:v:82:y:2025:i:c:s0969698924003953. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-retailing-and-consumer-services .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.