IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/joreco/v82y2025ics0969698924003771.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

When should the fresh-food retailer embrace near-expired food commercialization?

Author

Listed:
  • Lyu, Zhengwei
  • Lan, Hongjie
  • Liu, Samuel Shuai
  • Hua, Guowei
  • Cheng, T.C.E.

Abstract

Despite the potential of near-expired food commercialization (NFC) to recover value from unsold food, skepticism persists due to concern about its impact on fresh food margins. This study introduces a game-theoretic model to explore the optimal strategy and price-setting timing for the fresh-food retailer considering NFC. We find that the optimal strategy transitions from no NFC to partial and then to full NFC as the order quantity increases. Specifically, under full NFC, the fresh-food retailer with strong bargaining power and high perceived quality benefits from adopting clearance-priority pricing, which prioritizes the pricing of the near-expired food. Conversely, the retailer with limited power and lower perceived quality prefers fresh-priority pricing, which sets the retail price of fresh food first. Under partial NFC, while clearance-priority pricing generally yields profits, the high disposal cost may compel even powerful fresh-food retailers to switch to fresh-priority pricing to mitigate the risks associated with negotiation failures. We further analyze extended models to confirm the robustness of our findings. Our research contributes to the literature and guides practice by addressing common misconceptions about NFC.

Suggested Citation

  • Lyu, Zhengwei & Lan, Hongjie & Liu, Samuel Shuai & Hua, Guowei & Cheng, T.C.E., 2025. "When should the fresh-food retailer embrace near-expired food commercialization?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:joreco:v:82:y:2025:i:c:s0969698924003771
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.104081
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969698924003771
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.104081?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:joreco:v:82:y:2025:i:c:s0969698924003771. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-retailing-and-consumer-services .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.